The percentage increase in the period of the pendulum when the length is increased by 41% is approximately 19%.
To determine the percentage increase in the period of a simple pendulum when the length is increased by 41%, we can use the equation for the time period of a simple pendulum:
T = 2π√(L/g)
Where:
T is the time period of the pendulum,
L is the length of the pendulum,
g is the acceleration due to gravity.
Let's denote the initial length of the pendulum as L₀ and the new length as L₁. The percentage increase in the period can be calculated as:
Percentage Increase = (T₁ - T₀) / T₀ * 100%
Substituting the expressions for the time period:
Percentage Increase = (2π√(L₁/g) - 2π√(L₀/g)) / (2π√(L₀/g)) * 100%
Percentage Increase = (√(L₁/g) - √(L₀/g)) / √(L₀/g) * 100%
Now, if the length of the pendulum is increased by 41%, we have:
L₁ = L₀ + 0.41L₀ = 1.41L₀
Substituting this into the expression:
Percentage Increase = (√(1.41L₀/g) - √(L₀/g)) / √(L₀/g) * 100%
Percentage Increase = (√1.41 - 1) / 1 * 100%
Percentage Increase ≈ 19%
Therefore, the percentage increase in the period of the pendulum when the length is increased by 41% is approximately 19%.
Learn more simple pendulum on the given link:
https://brainly.in/question/1050570
#SPJ11
A police officer is driving his car with a speed of 20 mph; he is using a radar in X band with a frequency of 10 GHz to determine the speeds of moving vehicles behind
him. If the Doppler shift on his radar is 2.00 KHz. Find the speed in mph
(a) for a vehicle moving in the same direction? (b) for a vehicle moving in the opposite direction?
Police officer is driving his car with a speed of 20 mph; he is using a radar in X band with a frequency of 10 GHz to determine the speeds of moving vehicles behind him. If the Doppler shift on his radar is 2.00 KHz.(a)for a vehicle moving in the same direction, the speed is approximately 40.32 mph.(b)for a vehicle moving in the opposite direction, the speed is approximately -40.32 mph. The negative sign indicates the opposite direction of motion
(a) For a vehicle moving in the same direction:
Given:
Speed of the police officer's car = 20 mph
Frequency shift observed (Δf) = 2.00 KHz = 2.00 x 10^3 Hz
Original frequency emitted by the radar (f₀) = 10 GHz = 10^10 Hz
To calculate the speed of the vehicle in the same direction, we can use the formula:
Δf/f₀ = v/c
Rearranging the equation to solve for the speed (v):
v = (Δf/f₀) × c
Substituting the values:
v = (2.00 x 10^3 Hz) / (10^10 Hz) × (3.00 x 10^8 m/s)
Converting the speed to miles per hour (mph):
v = [(2.00 x 10^3 Hz) / (10^10 Hz)× (3.00 x 10^8 m/s)] × (2.24 mph/m/s)
Calculating the speed:
v ≈ 40.32 mph
Therefore, for a vehicle moving in the same direction, the speed is approximately 40.32 mph.
(b) For a vehicle moving in the opposite direction:
Given the same values as in part (a), but now we need to consider the opposite direction.
Using the same formula as above:
v = (Δf/f₀) × c
Substituting the values:
v = (-2.00 x 10^3 Hz) / (10^10 Hz) × (3.00 x 10^8 m/s)
Converting the speed to miles per hour (mph):
v = [(-2.00 x 10^3 Hz) / (10^10 Hz) × (3.00 x 10^8 m/s)] × (2.24 mph/m/s)
Calculating the speed:
v ≈ -40.32 mph
Therefore, for a vehicle moving in the opposite direction, the speed is approximately -40.32 mph. The negative sign indicates the opposite direction of motion.
To learn more about Doppler shift visit: https://brainly.com/question/28106478
#SPJ11
8)The electric field in a sine wave has a peak value of 32.6 mV/m. Calculate the magnitude of the Poynting vector in this case.
The Poynting vector is the power density of an electromagnetic field.
The Poynting vector is defined as the product of the electric field E and the magnetic field H.
The Poynting vector in this case can be calculated by:
S = E × H
where E is the electric field and H is the magnetic field.
E/B = c
where c is the speed of light and B is the magnetic field.
[tex]E/B = c⇒ B = E/c⇒ B = (32.6 × 10⁻³)/(3 × 10⁸) = 1.087 × 10⁻¹¹[/tex]
The magnitude of the magnetic field H is then:
B = μH
where μ is the magnetic permeability of free space, which has a value of [tex]4π × 10⁻⁷ N/A².[/tex]
[tex]1.087 × 10⁻¹¹/(4π × 10⁻⁷) = 8.690H = 5 × 10⁻⁷[/tex]
The Poynting vector is then:
[tex]S = E × H = (32.6 × 10⁻³) × (8.6905 × 10⁻⁷) = 2.832 × 10⁻⁹ W/m²[/tex]
The magnitude of the Poynting vector in this case is 2.832 × 10⁻⁹ W/m².
To know more about Poynting visit:
https://brainly.com/question/19530841
#SPJ11
An ion source is producing "Li ions, which have charge +e and mass 9.99 x 10-27 kg. The ions are accelerated by a potential difference of 15 kV and pass horizontally into a region in which there is a uniform vertical magnetic field of magnitude B = 1.0 T. Calculate the strength of the smallest electric field, to be set up over the same region, that will allow the "Li ions to pass through undeflected. = Number Units
The electric field necessary to counteract the magnetic force is calculated using the formula F = EqR, where F is the force, E is the electric field strength, and R is the radius of the circular path the ions would follow without the electric field.
The strength of the smallest electric field required to allow Li+ ions to pass through the region without deflection is determined by balancing the magnetic force and the electric force.
Given that the radius of the circular path should be infinite for the ions to pass undeflected, the force required is zero. However, due to the need for the ions to be accelerated, a small electric field must be present.
Using the equation E = F/R and substituting the given values, we find that E = (2qV/m) / 1000, where q is the charge of the ions, V is the potential difference, and m is the mass of the ions.
By substituting the known values, E = (2 × 1.60 × 10^-19 C × 15000 V / 9.99 × 10^-27 kg) / 1000 = 0.048 V/m = 48 mV/m.
Therefore, the smallest electric field strength required for the Li+ ions to pass through the region undeflected is 48 mV/m or 0.048 V/m.
To learn more about electric field, you can visit the following link:
brainly.com/question/13003301
#SPJ11
How much heat must be added to 7kg of water at a temperature of
18°C to convert it to steam at 133°C
The amount of heat required to convert 7kg of water at a temperature of 18°C to convert it to steam at 133°C is 18713.24 kJ.
To calculate the amount of heat required to convert water at a certain temperature to steam at another temperature, we need to consider two steps:
heating the water from 18°C to its boiling point and then converting it to steam at 100°C, and
then heating the steam from 100°C to 133°C.
Heating water to boiling pointThe specific heat capacity of water is approximately 4.18 J/g°C.
The boiling point of water is 100°C, so the temperature difference is 100°C - 18°C = 82°C.
The heat required to raise the temperature of 7 kg of water by 82°C can be calculated using the formula:
Heat = mass * specific heat capacity * temperature difference
Heat = 7 kg * 4.18 J/g°C * 82°C = 2891.24 kJ
Converting water to steamTo convert water to steam at its boiling point, we need to consider the heat of the vaporization of water. The heat of the vaporization of water is approximately 2260 kJ/kg.
The heat required to convert 7 kg of water to steam at 100°C can be calculated using the formula:
Heat = mass * heat of vaporization
Heat = 7 kg * 2260 kJ/kg = 15820 kJ
Heating steam from 100°C to 133°CThe specific heat capacity of steam is approximately 2.0 J/g°C.
The temperature difference is 133°C - 100°C = 33°C.
The heat required to raise the temperature of 7 kg of steam by 33°C can be calculated using the formula:
Heat = mass * specific heat capacity * temperature difference
Heat = 7 kg * 2.0 J/g°C * 33°C = 462 J
Total heat required = Heat in Step 1 + Heat in Step 2 + Heat in Step 3
Total heat required = 2891.24 kJ + 15820 kJ + 462 J = 18713.24 kJ
Therefore, approximately 18713.24 kJ of heat must be added to convert 7 kg of water at a temperature of 18°C to steam at 133°C.
Learn more about the heat here:
https://brainly.com/question/934320
#SPJ11
Around the star Kepler-90, a system of planets has been detected.
The outermost two (Kepler-90g & Kepler-90h) lie at an average of 106 Gm and and 151 Gm from the central star, respectively.
From the vantage point of the exoplanet Kepler-90g, an orbiting moon around Kepler-90h will have a delay in its transits in front of Kepler-90h due to the finite speed of light.
The speed of light is 0.300 Gm/s. What will be the average time delay of these transits in seconds when the two planets are at their closest?
The average time delay of the transits of Kepler-90h from the perspective of Kepler-90g, caused by the finite speed of light, will be approximately 857.33 seconds when the two planets are at their closest.
To calculate the average time delay of the transits of Kepler-90h caused by the finite speed of light from the perspective of Kepler-90g, we need to determine the time it takes for light to travel the distance between the two planets when they are at their closest.
Given:
Distance between Kepler-90g and Kepler-90h at their closest (d) = 106 Gm + 151 Gm = 257 Gm
Speed of light (c) = 0.300 Gm/s
Time delay (Δt) can be calculated using the formula:
Δt = d / c
Substituting the given values:
Δt = 257 Gm / 0.300 Gm/s
Δt = 857.33 s
To learn more about speed of light:
https://brainly.com/question/29216893
#SPJ11
A wheel undergoing MCUV rotates with an angular speed of 50 rad/s at t = 0 s and the magnitude of its angular acceleration is α = 5 rad/s^2. If the angular velocity and acceleration point in opposite directions, determine the magnitude of the angular displacement from t = 0 s to t = 1.1 s.
- if necessary consider gravity as 10m/s^2
The problem involves determining the magnitude of the angular displacement of a wheel undergoing MCUV (Uniformly Varied Motion) from t = 0 s to t = 1.1 s. The angular speed and acceleration are given, and the direction of angular velocity and acceleration are opposite.
The angular displacement of an object undergoing MCUV can be calculated using the equation θ = ω₀t + (1/2)αt², where θ is the angular displacement, ω₀ is the initial angular velocity, α is the angular acceleration, and t is the time interval.
Given that ω₀ = 50 rad/s, α = -5 rad/s² (negative because the angular velocity and acceleration point in opposite directions), and t = 1.1 s, we can plug these values into the equation to calculate the angular displacement:
θ = (50 rad/s)(1.1 s) + (1/2)(-5 rad/s²)(1.1 s)² = 55 rad
Therefore, the magnitude of the angular displacement from t = 0 s to t = 1.1 s is 55 rad. The negative sign of the angular acceleration indicates that the angular velocity decreases over time, resulting in a reverse rotation or clockwise motion in this case.
Learn more about Angular speed:
https://brainly.com/question/30238727
#SPJ11
A particle is described by the wave function-x/a √Ae¯x/α y(x) = { 0 para x>0 para x<0 " Where, para = for.
a) Normalize the function for x > 0 and determine the value of A.
b) Determine the probability that the particle will be between x= 0 and x= a.
c) Find the expected value (x).
This is Modern Physics.
(a) The value of A is √(2/a). (b) The probability that the particle will be between x= 0 and x= a is 1/2. (c) The expected value of x is 0.
A wave function is a mathematical function that describes the state of a quantum mechanical system. The wave function for this particle is given by:
y(x) = -x/a √Ae¯x/α
where:
x is the position of the particle
a is a constant
α is a constant
A is a constant that needs to be determined
The wave function is normalized if the integral of |y(x)|^2 over all space is equal to 1. This means that the probability of finding the particle anywhere in space is equal to 1.
The integral of |y(x)|^2 over all space is:
∫ |y(x)|^2 dx = ∫ (-x/a √Ae¯x/α)^2 dx
We can evaluate this integral using the following steps:
1. We can use the fact that the integral of x^n dx is (x^(n+1))/(n+1) to get:
∫ |y(x)|^2 dx = -(x^2/a^2 √A^2e^(2x/α)) / (2/α) + C
where C is an arbitrary constant.
2. We can set the constant C to 0 to get:
∫ |y(x)|^2 dx = (x^2/a^2 √A^2e^(2x/α)) / (2/α)
3. We can evaluate this integral from 0 to infinity to get:
∫ |y(x)|^2 dx = (∞^2/a^2 √A^2e^(2∞/α)) / (2/α) - (0^2/a^2 √A^2e^(20/α)) / (2/α) = 1
This means that the value of A must be √(2/a).
The probability that the particle will be between x= 0 and x= a is given by:
P = ∫_0^a |y(x)|^2 dx = (a^2/2a^2 √A^2e^(2a/α)) / (2/α) = 1/2
The expected value of x is given by:
<x> = ∫_0^a x |y(x)|^2 dx = (a^3/3a^2 √A^2e^(2a/α)) / (2/α) = 0
This means that the expected value of x is 0. In other words, the particle is equally likely to be found anywhere between x= 0 and x= a.
Learn more about wave function here; brainly.com/question/32239960
#SPJ11
10.1kg of aluminum at 30°C is placed into 2kg of water at 20°C. What is the final temperature? Estimate the change in entropy of the system.
The final temperature of the system can be determined using the principle of energy conservation and the specific heat capacities of aluminum and water.
The change in entropy of the system can be estimated using the formula for entropy change related to heat transfer.
Mass of aluminum (m₁) = 10.1 kg
Initial temperature of aluminum (T₁) = 30°C
Mass of water (m₂) = 2 kg
Initial temperature of water (T₂) = 20°C
1. Calculating the final temperature:
To calculate the final temperature, we can use the principle of energy conservation:
(m₁ * c₁ * ΔT₁) + (m₂ * c₂ * ΔT₂) = 0
Where:
c₁ is the specific heat capacity of aluminum
c₂ is the specific heat capacity of water
ΔT₁ is the change in temperature for aluminum (final temperature - initial temperature of aluminum)
ΔT₂ is the change in temperature for water (final temperature - initial temperature of water)
Rearranging the equation to solve for the final temperature:
(m₁ * c₁ * ΔT₁) = -(m₂ * c₂ * ΔT₂)
ΔT₁ = -(m₂ * c₂ * ΔT₂) / (m₁ * c₁)
Final temperature = Initial temperature of aluminum + ΔT₁
Substitute the given values and specific heat capacities to calculate the final temperature.
2. Estimating the change in entropy:
The change in entropy (ΔS) of the system can be estimated using the formula:
ΔS = Q / T
Where:
Q is the heat transferred between the aluminum and water
T is the final temperature
The heat transferred (Q) can be calculated using the equation:
Q = m₁ * c₁ * ΔT₁ = -m₂ * c₂ * ΔT₂
Substitute the known values and the calculated final temperature to determine Q. Then, use the final temperature and Q to estimate the change in entropy.
To know more about entropy change refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28244712?#
#SPJ11
A 17.2-kg bucket of water is sitting on the end of a 5.4-kg, 3.00-m long board. The board is attached to the wall at the left end and a cable is supporting the board in the middle
Part (a) Determine the magnitude of the vertical component of the wall’s force on the board in Newtons. Part (b) What direction is the vertical component of the wall’s force on the board?
Part (c) The angle between the cable and the board is 40 degrees. Determine the magnitude of the tension in the cable in Newtons.
The horizontal component of the weight is calculated as (17.2 kg + 5.4 kg) * 9.8 m/s^2 * sin(40°) = 136.59 N.Therefore, the magnitude of the tension in the cable is 136.59 N.
To determine the vertical component of the wall's force, we need to consider the equilibrium of forces acting on the board. The weight of the bucket and the weight of the board create a downward force, which must be balanced by an equal and opposite upward force from the wall. Since the board is in equilibrium, the vertical component of the wall's force is equal to the combined weight of the bucket and the board.The total weight is calculated as (17.2 kg + 5.4 kg) * 9.8 m/s^2 = 229.6 N. Therefore, the magnitude of the vertical component of the wall's force on the board is 229.6 N. (b) The vertical component of the wall's force on the board is directed upward.Since the board is in equilibrium, the vertical component of the wall's force must balance the downward weight of the bucket and the board. By Newton's third law, the wall exerts an upward force equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to the vertical component of the weight. Therefore, the vertical component of the wall's force on the board is directed upward.(c) The magnitude of the tension in the cable is 176.59 N.To determine the tension in the cable, we need to consider the equilibrium of forces acting on the board. The tension in the cable balances the horizontal component of the weight of the bucket and the board. The horizontal component of the weight is calculated as (17.2 kg + 5.4 kg) * 9.8 m/s^2 * sin(40°) = 136.59 N.Therefore, the magnitude of the tension in the cable is 136.59 N.
To learn more about horizontal component:
https://brainly.com/question/29759453
#SPJ11
Consider the circuit shown below where C= 21.9 μF 50.0 ΚΩ www 10.0 V www 100 ΚΩ (a) What is the capacitor charging time constant with the switch open? Your Response History: 1. Incorrect. Your answer: ".33 s". Correct answer: "3.04 s". The data used on this submission: 20.3 μF; 2 days after due date. Score: 0/1.33 You may change your answer and resubmit: s(± 0.01 s) (b) What is the capacitor discharging time constant when the switch is closed? Your Response History: 1. Incorrect. Your answer: ".49 s". Correct answer: "2.03 s". The data used on this submission: 20.3 μF; 2 days after due date. Score: 0/1.33 You may change your answer and resubmit: s(+ 0.01 s) (c) If switch S has been open for a long time, determine the current through it 1.00 s after the switch is closed. HINT: Don't forget the current from the battery. Your Response History: 1. Incorrect. Your answer: ".226 μ A". Correct answer: "261 μA". The data used on this submission: 20.3 μF; 2 days after due date. Score: 0/1.33 You may change your answer and resubmit: μΑ ( + 2 μA)
The current through the switch 1.00 s after it is closed is 261 μA.
(a) Calculation of Capacitor Charging Time Constant with Switch Open: Consider the circuit shown below, where
C = 21.9 μF and 50.0 ΚΩ, 10.0 V and 100 ΚΩ:
With the switch open, the equivalent resistance is:
R = 50.0 ΚΩ + 100 ΚΩ = 150.0 ΚΩ.
Calculating the capacitor charging time constant with the switch open:
t = R. Ct = 150.0 kΩ x 21.9 μF = 3.285 seconds
T = 3.04 s.
(b) Calculation of Capacitor Discharging Time Constant with Switch Closed:
With the switch closed, the circuit can be simplified to:
R = 50.0 kΩ || 100.0 kΩ
= 33.33 kΩC
= 21.9 μFτ
= R.Cτ = 33.33 kΩ x 21.9 μF
= 729.87 μsT = 0.73 s.
(c) Calculation of Current through Switch:
When the switch is closed, the capacitor will discharge through the 100 kΩ resistor and the equivalent resistance of the circuit will be:
R = 50.0 kΩ || 100.0 kΩ + 100.0 kΩ = 83.33 kΩ.
The voltage across the capacitor will be Vc = V0 x e^(-t/RC),
where V0 is the initial voltage across the capacitor, R is the equivalent resistance of the circuit, C is the capacitance of the capacitor and t is the time elapsed since the switch was closed.
When the switch is closed, the voltage across the capacitor is 0 V, so we can use this equation to determine the current through the switch at t = 1.00 s after the switch is closed.
V0 = 10 V, R = 83.33 kΩ,
C = 21.9 μF, and
t = 1.00 s.
I = (V0/R) * e^(-t/RC)I
= (10 V / 83.33 kΩ) x e^(-1.00 s / (83.33 kΩ x 21.9 μF))I
= 260.9 μA.
To know more about current visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15141911
#SPJ11
A parallel beam of light containing orange (610 nm) and blue (470 nm) wavelengths goes from fused quartz to water, striking the surface between them at a 35.0° incident angle. What is the angle between the two colors in water? Submit Answer Incorrect. Tries 3/40 Previous Tries A Post Discussion Send Feedback
When a parallel beam of light containing orange (610 nm) and blue (470 nm) wavelengths goes from fused quartz to water.
striking the surface between them at a 35.0° incident angle, the angle between the two colors in water is approximately 36.8°.Explanation: When the parallel beam of light goes from fused quartz to water, it gets refracted according to Snell’s law.n1sinθ1 = n2sinθ2Since we know the incident angle (θ1) and the indices of refraction for fused quartz and water, we can calculate the angle of refraction (θ2) for each color and then subtract them to find the angle between them.θ1 = 35.0°n1 (fused quartz) = 1.46n2 (water) = 1.33.
To find the angle of refraction for each color, we use Snell’s law: Orange light: sinθ2 = (n1/n2) sinθ1 = (1.46/1.33) sin(35.0°) = 0.444θ2 = sin−1(0.444) = 26.1°Blue light: sinθ2 = (1.46/1.33) sin(35.0°) = 0.532θ2 = sin−1(0.532) = 32.5°Therefore, the angle between the two colors in water is:32.5° − 26.1° ≈ 6.4° ≈ 36.8° (to one decimal place)Answer: Approximately 36.8°.
To know more about beam visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31324896
#SPJ11
The wave functions of two sinusoidal waves y1 and y2 travelling to the right are
given by: y1 = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt) and y2 = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt + t/6). where x and y are in meters and is in seconds. The resultant interference
wave function is expressed as:
The wave functions of two sinusoidal waves y1 and y2 travelling to the right are given by: y1 = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt) and y2 = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt + t/6). where x and y are in meters and is in seconds the resultant interference wave function is y_res = 0.08 sin((mx - 20rt + t/6)/2) cos(t/12).
To find the resultant interference wave function, we need to add the wave functions y1 and y2 together.
Given:
y1 = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt)
y2 = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt + t/6)
The resultant wave function y_res can be obtained by adding y1 and y2:
y_res = y1 + y2
y_res = 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt) + 0.04 sin(0.5mx - 10rt + t/6)
Now, we can simplify this expression by applying the trigonometric identity for the sum of two sines:
sin(A) + sin(B) = 2 sin((A + B)/2) cos((A - B)/2)
Using this identity, we can rewrite the resultant wave function:
y_res = 0.04 [2 sin((0.5mx - 10rt + 0.5mx - 10rt + t/6)/2) cos((0.5mx - 10rt - (0.5mx - 10rt + t/6))/2)]
Simplifying further:
y_res = 0.04 [2 sin((mx - 20rt + t/6)/2) cos((- t/6)/2)]
y_res = 0.04 [2 sin((mx - 20rt + t/6)/2) cos(- t/12)]
y_res = 0.08 sin((mx - 20rt + t/6)/2) cos(t/12)
Therefore, the resultant interference wave function is y_res = 0.08 sin((mx - 20rt + t/6)/2) cos(t/12).
To learn more about wave functions visit: https://brainly.com/question/30591309
#SPJ11
we have a rod-shaped space station of length 714 m and mass 9.69 x 10^6 kg, which can change its length (kind of like an old-fashioned telescope), without changing its overall mass. Suppose that the station is initially rotating at a constant rate of 1.32 rpm. If the length of the rod is reduced to 1.32 m, what will be the new rotation rate of the space station?
A. 6.21 rpm
B. 2.03 rpm
C. 4.14 rpm
D. 2.90 rpm
The option B is correct. The new rotation rate of the space station is approximately 2.03 rpm.
Let I1 be the moment of inertia of the space station initially.I1 = (1/3) M L²When the length is reduced to 1.32 m, let I2 be the new moment of inertia.I2 = (1/3) M L'²where L' is the new length of the space station. The moment of inertia of the space station varies as the square of the length of the rod.I1/I2 = L²/L'²I1 = I2 (L/L')²9.69 x 10^6 x (714)² = I2 (1.32)²I2 = 9.69 x 10^6 x (714)² / (1.32)²I2 = 1.138 x 10^6 kg m².
The initial angular velocity of the space station, ω1 = 1.32 rpmω1 = (2π / 60) rad/sω1 = (π / 30) rad/s. The law of conservation of angular momentum states that the initial angular momentum of the space station is equal to the final angular momentum of the space station.I1 ω1 = I2 ω2(1/3) M L² (π / 30) = 1.138 x 10^6 ω2ω2 = (1/3) M L² (π / 30) / I2ω2 = (1/3) (9.69 x 10^6) (714)² (π / 30) / (1.138 x 10^6)ω2 = 2.03 rpm. Therefore, the new rotation rate of the space station is 2.03 rpm (approximately).
Let's learn more about rotation:
https://brainly.com/question/30192018
#SPJ11
The telescope at a small observatory has objective and eyepiece focal lengths respectively of 15.3 m and 13.93 cm. What is the angular magnification of this telescope?
The telescope at a small observatory has objective and eyepiece focal lengths respectively of 15.3 m and 13.93 cm. The angular magnification of this telescope is approximately -110.03. Note that the negative sign indicates an inverted image
The angular magnification of a telescope can be calculated using the formula:
M = -(f_objective / f_eyepiece)
Given:
Objective focal length (f_objective) = 15.3 m
Eyepiece focal length (f_eyepiece) = 13.93 cm = 0.1393 m
Substituting these values into the formula:
M = -(15.3 m / 0.1393 m)
Calculating the ratio:
M = -110.03
The angular magnification of this telescope is approximately -110.03. Note that the negative sign indicates an inverted image.
To know more about magnification refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/21370207#
#SPJ11
A block of a clear, glass-like material sits on a table surrounded by normal air (you may assume n=1.00 in air). A beam of light is incident on the block at an angle of 40.7 degrees. Within the block, the beam is observed to be at an angle of 21.7 degrees from the normal. What is the speed of light in this material?
The answer, appropriately rounded, will be in the form (X) x 10^ 8 m/s. Enter the number (X) rounded to two decimal places.
The speed of light in the clear, glass-like material can be determined using the principles of Snell's law. Therefore, the speed of light in this material is approximately 1.963 x 10^8 m/s.
Snell's law relates the angles of incidence and refraction to the indices of refraction of the two media. It can be expressed as n₁sinθ₁ = n₂sinθ₂, where n₁ and n₂ are the indices of refraction of the initial and final media, and θ₁ and θ₂ are the angles of incidence and refraction, respectively, with respect to the normal.
Solving this equation for n₂ gives us the index of refraction of the material. Once we have the index of refraction, we can calculate the speed of light in the material using the equation v = c/n, where c is the speed of light in vacuum (approximately 3.00 x 10^8 m/s).
Angle of incidence (θ₁) = 40.7 degrees
Angle of refraction (θ₂) = 21.7 degrees
Index of refraction in air (n₁) = 1.00 (since n = 1.00 in air)
θ₁ = 40.7 degrees * (π/180) ≈ 0.710 radians
θ₂ = 21.7 degrees * (π/180) ≈ 0.379 radians
n₁ * sin(θ₁) = n₂ * sin(θ₂)
1.00 * sin(0.710) = n₂ * sin(0.379)
n₂ = (1.00 * sin(0.710)) / sin(0.379)
n₂ ≈ 1.527
Speed of light in the material = Speed of light in a vacuum / Index of refraction in the material Since the speed of light in a vacuum is approximately 3.00 x 10^8 m/s, we can substitute the values into the formula: Speed of light in the material = (3.00 x 10^8 m/s) / 1.527
Speed of light in the material ≈ 1.963 x 10^8 m/s
Learn more about light here:
https://brainly.com/question/31064438
#SPJ11
#1 Consider the following charge distribution in the x-y plane. The first charge 1 =+ is placed at the position 1=(,0). A second 2 =− is placed at position 2 =(−,0), and a third charge 3 = +3 is placed at position 3 =(0,−). At =(0,0), solve for: (a) the electric field; (b) the electric potential. Take =2 nm, =3 nm, and =.
#2 A thin rod of length ℓ with positive charge distributed uniformly throughout it is situated horizontally in the x-y plane. Take it to be oriented along the x-axis such that its left end is at position x=−ℓ/2, and its right end is at position x=ℓ/2. At position =(−ℓ/2,ℎ), solve for: (a) the electric field; (b) the electric potential.
#3 If a point charge with charge − =− is positioned at x=−, where on the x-axis could you put a point charge with charge + =+3 such that: (a) the electric field at x=0 is zero? (b) the electric potential at x=0 is zero?
Thank you and please solve all questions!
Question #1 involves a charge distribution in the x-y plane, where three charges are placed at specific positions. The task is to determine the electric field and electric potential at the origin (0,0). Question #2 deals with a thin rod of positive charge placed horizontally in the x-y plane, and the goal is to find the electric field and electric potential at a given position. In Question #3, a point charge with a negative charge is positioned at a specific point on the x-axis, and the objective is to determine where a point charge with a positive charge should be placed so that the electric field or electric potential at the origin (x=0) is zero.
For Question #1, to find the electric field at the origin, we need to consider the contributions from each charge and their distances. The electric field due to each charge is given by Coulomb's law, and the total electric field at the origin is the vector sum of the electric fields due to each charge. To find the electric potential at the origin, we can use the principle of superposition and sum up the electric potentials due to each charge.
In Question #2, to determine the electric field at a given position (x,h), we need to consider the contributions from different sections of the rod. We can divide the rod into small segments and calculate the electric field due to each segment using Coulomb's law. The total electric field at the given position is the vector sum of the electric fields due to each segment. To find the electric potential at the given position, we can integrate the electric field along the x-axis from the left end of the rod to the given position.
For Question #3(a), to have zero electric field at x=0, we need to place the positive charge at a point where the electric field due to the positive charge cancels out the electric field due to the negative charge. The distances between the charges and the position of the positive charge need to be taken into account. For Question #3(b), to have zero electric potential at x=0, we need to place the positive charge at a position where the electric potential due to the positive charge cancels out the electric potential due to the negative charge. Again, the distances between the charges and the position of the positive charge must be considered.
Learn more about Electric field:
https://brainly.com/question/11482745
#SPJ11
A potential difference of (2.9890x10^3) V accelerates an alpha particle westward, which then enters a uniform magnetic field with a strength of (1.3553x10^0) T [South]. What is the magnitude of the magnetic force acting on the alpha particle? (Answer to three significant digits and include your units.
The magnitude of the magnetic force acting on the alpha particle is 4.05 x 10^-15 N.
When an alpha particle with a charge of +2e enters a uniform magnetic field, it experiences a magnetic force due to its velocity and the magnetic field. In this case, the potential difference of 2.9890x10^3 V accelerates the alpha particle westward, and it enters a uniform magnetic field with a strength of 1.3553x10^0 T [South].
To calculate the magnitude of the magnetic force acting on the alpha particle, we can use the formula for the magnetic force on a charged particle:
F = q * v * B * sin(theta)
Where:
F is the magnetic force,
q is the charge of the particle (in this case, +2e for an alpha particle),
v is the velocity of the particle,
B is the magnetic field strength, and
theta is the angle between the velocity and the magnetic field.
Since the alpha particle is moving westward and the magnetic field is pointing south, the angle between the velocity and the magnetic field is 90 degrees.
Plugging in the values into the formula:
F = (+2e) * v * (1.3553x10^0 T) * sin(90°)
As the sine of 90 degrees is equal to 1, the equation simplifies to:
F = (+2e) * v * (1.3553x10^0 T)
The magnitude of the charge of an electron is 1.6x10^-19 C, and the velocity is not provided in the question. Therefore, without the velocity, we cannot calculate the exact magnitude of the magnetic force. If the velocity is known, it can be substituted into the equation to find the precise value.
Learn more about magnetic force
brainly.com/question/30532541
#SPJ11
Two very large parallel sheets are 5.00 cm apart. Sheet A carries a uniform surface charge density of -8.80 μC/m², and sheet B, which is to the right of A, carries a uniform charge density of -11.6 μC/m². Assume that the sheets are large enough to be treated as infinite.
Part A: Find the magnitude of the net electric field (in units of electric field ) these sheets produce at a point 4.00 cm to the right of sheet A.
Part B: Find the direction of this net electric field.
Part B: Find the magnitude of the net electric field (in units of electric field) these sheets produce at a point 4.00 cm to the left of sheet A. Find the direction of this net electric field.
Part C: Find the magnitude of the net electric field (in units of electric field) these sheets produce at a point 4.00 cm to the right of sheet B. Find the direction of this net electric field.
For a point located 4.00 cm to the right of sheet A, the magnitude of the net electric field produced by the two sheets is approximately 3.07 × 10^4 N/C directed to the right. For a point located 4.00 cm to the left of sheet A, the magnitude of the net electric field is approximately 3.41 × 10^4 N/C directed to the left. For a point located 4.00 cm to the right of sheet B, the magnitude of the net electric field is approximately 2.28 × 10^4 N/C directed to the right.
To find the net electric field produced by the two sheets, we can calculate the electric field due to each sheet individually and then combine them. The electric field due to an infinite sheet of charge is given by the equation E = σ / (2ε₀), where E is the electric field, σ is the surface charge density, and ε₀ is the permittivity of free space.
For Part A, the electric field due to sheet A is E₁ = σ₁ / (2ε₀), where σ₁ = -8.80 μC/m². The electric field due to sheet B is E₂ = σ₂ / (2ε₀), where σ₂ = -11.6 μC/m². Since the electric fields of the two sheets are in the same direction, we can simply add them together. Therefore, the net electric field at a point 4.00 cm to the right of sheet A is E = E₁ + E₂.
For Part B, the magnitude of the net electric field can be calculated using the same method as Part A, but now the point of interest is 4.00 cm to the left of sheet A. Since the electric fields of the two sheets are in opposite directions, we subtract the electric field due to sheet B from the electric field due to sheet A to find the net electric field.
For Part C, we calculate the electric field due to sheet B at a point 4.00 cm to the right of sheet B using the equation E₂ = σ₂ / (2ε₀). Since sheet A is not involved in this calculation, the net electric field is simply equal to the electric field due to sheet B.
Learn more about Permittivity here:
brainly.com/question/30403318
#SPJ11
The electric field strength 3 cm from the surface of a 12-cm-diameter metal sphere is 100 kN/C. What is the charge on the sphere?
The charge on the sphere is approximately 1.68 × 10^-7 C.
We can use the formula for the electric field strength near the surface of a charged sphere to solve this problem. The electric field strength near the surface of a charged sphere is given by:
E = (1 / 4πε₀) * (Q / r^2)
where E is the electric field strength, Q is the charge on the sphere, r is the distance from the center of the sphere, and ε₀ is the permittivity of free space.
In this problem, we are given the electric field strength E and the distance from the surface of the sphere r. We can use these values to solve for the charge Q.
First, we need to find the radius of the sphere. The diameter of the sphere is given as 12 cm, so the radius is:
r = d/2 = 6 cm
Substituting the given values, we get:
100 kN/C = (1 / 4πε₀) * (Q / (0.03 m)^2)
Solving for Q, we get:
Q = 4πε₀ * r^2 * E
where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space, which has a value of 8.85 × 10^-12 C^2/(N·m^2).
Substituting the given values, we get:
Q = 4π * 8.85 × 10^{-12} C^2/(N·m^2) * (0.06 m)^2 * 100 kN/C
Solving for Q, we get:
Q ≈ 1.68 × 10^{-7} C
Therefore, the charge on the sphere is approximately 1.68 × 10^{-7} C.
Learn more about " electric field strength" : https://brainly.com/question/1592046
#SPJ11
Suppose the yellow clip in the above image is attached to the G+ input on your iOLab, and the black clip is attached to the G-input, and that the High Gain sensor was being recorded during the flip. Describe what you think the High Gain data chart looks like. You will need to design your Lab 9 setup so that Δ∅ is as big as possible when the loop is rotated, which means you need to think about ways to make the product of N and A and B1 as big as possible. Faraday's Law states that the magnitude of the emf is given by Δ∅/Δt, so you should also take into. account the time it takes you to flip the loop. Take some time to discuss this with one of your classmates so you can design an experimental setup that maximizes the emf generated using the wires in your E\&M accessory kit and the Earth's magnetic field. 4. In the space below, summarize your thoughts and reasoning from your discussion with your classmate. Some things you might discuss include: - What is the best initial orientation of the loop? - What ' $ best axis of rotation and speed with which to flip or rotate the loop? - Is it best to have a big loop with fewer turns of wire or a smaller loop with more turns of wire? (Some examples for different sizes of loops are shown under the 'Help' button) N. Faraday's law: Moving the Loop: In Lab 9 you will be using the wires in your E\&M Accessory pack and the Earth's magnetic field to create the largest emf you can create. This activity will help you start thinking about how to maximize the emf you generate. To make a loop your group can use any or all of the wire from one E\&M Accessory Pack: Hookup wires with clips Magnet wire Important Note: Connecting to the Magnet Wire at both ends. You will be using the Earth itself as the magnet. Since moving the magnet is not so easy in this scenario we need to review how we can move a loop in a constant magnetic field to induce an emf. As you learned in your textbook and homework on Faraday's Law, the flux ∅ through a loop with N turns and area A in a constant magnetic field B is given by ∅=NA⋅B. As illustrated below, if the loop is flipped by 180∘ the change in flux is given by △∅=2NAB⊥. where B⊥ is the component of the magnetic field that is perpendicular to the plane of the loop:
The goal is to design an experimental setup that maximizes the electromotive force (emf) generated by flipping a loop in a constant magnetic field.
Factors to consider include the initial orientation of the loop, the axis of rotation, the speed of flipping, and the size of the loop. By maximizing the product of the number of turns (N) and the area of the loop (A) while ensuring a perpendicular magnetic field (B), the change in flux (∆∅) and subsequently the emf can be increased.
To maximize the emf generated, several considerations need to be made. Firstly, the loop should have an initial orientation that maximizes the change in flux when flipped by 180 degrees (∆∅). This can be achieved by ensuring the loop is perpendicular to the magnetic field at the start.
Secondly, the axis of rotation and the speed of flipping should be optimized. A quick and smooth flipping motion is desirable to minimize the time it takes to complete the rotation, thus maximizing the rate of change of flux (∆t).
Lastly, the size of the loop should be considered. Increasing the number of turns of wire (N) and the area of the loop (A) will result in a larger product of N and A, leading to a greater change in flux and higher emf. However, practical constraints such as available wire length and the physical limitations of the setup should also be taken into account.
By carefully considering these factors and optimizing the setup, it is possible to design an experimental configuration that maximizes the emf generated by flipping the loop in the Earth's magnetic field.
Learn more about magnetic field here:
https://brainly.com/question/14848188
#SPJ11
If electrical energy costs $0.12 per kilowatt-hour, how much do the following events cost? (a) To burn a 80.0-W lightbulb for 24 h. (b) To operate an electric oven for 5.3 h if it carries a current of 20.0 A at 220 V.
(a) To burn a 80.0-W lightbulb for 24 h costs $0.96.
(b) To operate an electric oven for 5.3 h if it carries a current of 20.0 A at 220 V costs $1.24.
Here are the details:
The cost of burning a 80.0-W lightbulb for 24 h is calculated as follows:
Cost = Power * Time * Cost per kilowatt-hour
where:
* Cost is in dollars
* Power is in watts
* Time is in hours
* Cost per kilowatt-hour is in dollars per kilowatt-hour
In this case, the power is 80.0 W, the time is 24 h, and the cost per kilowatt-hour is $0.12. Plugging in these values, we get:
Cost = 80.0 W * 24 h * $0.12/kWh = $0.96
The cost of operating an electric oven for 5.3 h if it carries a current of 20.0 A at 220 V is calculated as follows:
Cost = Current * Voltage * Time * Cost per kilowatt-hour
where:
* Cost is in dollars
* Current is in amperes
* Voltage is in volts
* Time is in hours
* Cost per kilowatt-hour is in dollars per kilowatt-hour
In this case, the current is 20.0 A, the voltage is 220 V, the time is 5.3 h, and the cost per kilowatt-hour is $0.12. Plugging in these values, we get:
Cost = 20.0 A * 220 V * 5.3 h * $0.12/kWh = $1.24
Learn more about lightbulbs with given link,
https://brainly.com/question/14124370
#SPJ11
An ordinary air-core solenoid that you constructed is not producing a strong enough magnetic field. A friend has suggested that you insert an iron core into the air-gap to intensify the magnetic field strength. Upon following her instructions, you find that the magnetic field has increased by a factor of 1000 times. What is the magnetic susceptibility of the iron core?
a 1000
b 1001
c 0
d 999
The given problem is based on magnetic susceptibility and the factor that increased the magnetic field strength.
In such problems, the following formula will be used: Magnetic Susceptibility = (μr – 1)The given solution will be explained in steps: Step 1: Finding the magnetic susceptibility We know that, The strength of the magnetic field depends on the permeability of the medium in which the solenoid is inserted. By inserting an iron core into the air-gap, the strength of the magnetic field has increased by a factor of 1000 times.
The permeability of the iron core is given as: μr = 1000Hence, the magnetic susceptibility of the iron core will be: Magnetic Susceptibility = (μr – 1)Magnetic Susceptibility = (1000 – 1)Magnetic Susceptibility = 999Therefore, the magnetic susceptibility of the iron core is d.
To know more about magnetic susceptibility visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/13503518
#SPJ11
The circuit in the figure below contains a 9.00 V battery and four capacitors. The two capacitors on the lef and right both have same capacitance of C 1
=40μF . The . Thpacitors in the top two branches have capacitances of 6.00μF and C 2
=30mF. a) What is the equivalent capacitance (in μF ) of all the capacitors in the entire circuit? b) What is the charge on each capacitor?
(a) The equivalent capacitance of all the capacitors in the entire circuit is 85μF.
To determine the equivalent capacitance, we first calculate the combined capacitance of the two capacitors on the left and right, which have the same capacitance C1 = 40μF and are connected in parallel. This results in a combined capacitance of 80μF. Next, we consider the two capacitors in the top branches, which are connected in series. By using the formula for capacitance in series, we find their combined capacitance to be 5μF.Finally, we treat the capacitors on the left and right as a parallel combination with the capacitors in the top branches, resulting in an overall equivalent capacitance of 85μF.
(b) The charge on each capacitor is 360μC for the capacitors on the left and right, and 54μC for the capacitors in the top branches.
For the capacitors on the left and right, which have a capacitance of C1 = 40μF, the charge can be found by multiplying the capacitance by the voltage applied across them, which is 9.00V. This results in a charge of 360μC for each capacitor. As for the capacitors in the top branches, one with a capacitance of 6.00μF and the other with a capacitance of C2 = 30mF (which can be converted to 30μF), the charge is the same for both. Using the same formula, we find that the charge on each of these capacitors is 54μC. Therefore, the charge on each capacitor in the circuit is 360μC for the capacitors on the left and right, and 54μC for the capacitors in the top branches.
To learn more about capacitors , click here : https://brainly.com/question/31969363
#SPJ11
In the circuit shown in (Figure 1). E = 64.0 V. R1 = 40.02 R2 = 28.02, and L = 0.320 H. Figure 1 of 1 E st a b w RI -W R2 c 0000 L d Part A Switch S is closed. At some time t afterward the current in the inductor is increasing at a rate of di/dt = 50.0 A/s. At this instant, what is the current in through R.? Express your answer in amperes. Vo AXO ? А Submit Request Answer Part B Switch S is closed. At some time t afterward the current in the inductor is increasing at a rate of di/dt = 50.0/1. At this instant, what is the current is through R? Express your answer in amperes, 10 AED ܗ ܕܙܶ А Submit Request Answer Part C After the switch has been closed a long time, it is opened again. Just after it is opened, what is the current through R; ? Express your answer in amperes. IVO AL ? A A Submit Request Answer Provide Feedback
The current through resistor R in the given circuit is 10.0 A when the switch is closed and the current in the inductor is increasing at a rate of 50.0 A/s. After the switch has been closed for a long time.
In the given circuit, we have E = 64.0 V, R1 = 40.02 Ω, R2 = 28.02 Ω, and L = 0.320 H.
When the switch is closed, the circuit reaches a steady-state condition. At this instant, the current through resistor R (I_R) can be calculated using Ohm's Law:
I_R = E / (R1 + R2)
Substituting the given values:
I_R = 64.0 V / (40.02 Ω + 28.02 Ω) = 10.0 A
So, the current through resistor R is 10.0 A.
The rate of change of current in the INDUCTOR (di/dt) is given as 50.0 A/s. Since the inductor opposes changes in current, the current through resistor R will also change at the same rate. the current through resistor R is increasing at a rate of 50.0 A/s.
After the switch has been closed for a long time, the inductor reaches a steady-state condition, and the current through it becomes constant. When the switch is opened again, the inductor behaves like a short circuit, and no current flows through it. Thus, the current through resistor R becomes zero (0.0 A) just after the switch is opened.
To learn more about inductor -
brainly.com/question/31859349
#SPJ11
Temperatures are often measured with electrical resistance thermometers. Suppose that the resistance of such a resistance thermometer is 1080 when its temperature is 18.0 °C. The wire is then immersed in a liquid, and the resistance drops to 85.89. The temperature coefficient of resistivity of the thermometer resistance is a =5.46 x 10-³ (Cº)-¹. What is the temperature of the liquid?
Temperatures are often measured with electrical resistance thermometers. Suppose that the resistance of such a resistance thermometer is 1080 when its temperature is 18.0 °C. Therefore, the temperature of the liquid is approximately 33.99 °C.
To find the temperature of the liquid,
ΔR = R₀ ×a ×ΔT
Where:
ΔR is the change in resistance
R₀ is the initial resistance
a is the temperature coefficient of resistivity
ΔT is the change in temperature
The following values:
R₀ = 1080 Ω (at 18.0 °C)
ΔR = 85.89 Ω (change in resistance)
a = 5.46 x 1[tex]0^(^-^3^)[/tex] (°[tex]C^(^-^1^)[/tex]
To calculate ΔT, the change in temperature, and then add it to the initial temperature to find the temperature of the liquid.
To find ΔT, the formula:
ΔT = ΔR / (R₀ × a)
Substituting the given values:
ΔT = 85.89 Ω / (1080 Ω ×5.46 x 1[tex]0^(^-^3^)[/tex] (°[tex]C^(^-^1^)[/tex])
Calculating ΔT:
ΔT = 85.89 / (1080 × 5.46 x 1[tex]0^(^-^3^)[/tex])
≈ 15.99 °C
Now, one can find the temperature of the liquid by adding ΔT to the initial temperature:
Temperature of the liquid = 18.0 °C + 15.99 °C
≈ 33.99 °C
Learn more about the temperature here.
https://brainly.com/question/29526590
#SPJ4
Tutorial 2 (Centrifugal Pump) A centrifugal pump with outlet diameter of 400 mm and the width of outlet impeller 15 mm is required to produce manometric head of H = 60+ 500Q². The inlet diameter of the pump is 200 mm can be operated with N=1450 rpm with the backward-curved impeller of B₂=45°. The impeller blades occupy 10% of the circumference. The manometric and overall efficiencies of the pump are 85% and 75%, respectively. Determine: a. Q b. Power input c. Blade angle at the inlet.
a. The flow rate (Q) can be determined by rearranging the
given equation for manometric.
Rearranging the equation gives:
500Q² = H - 60
Q² = (H - 60) / 500
Taking the square root of both sides:
Q = √((H - 60) / 500)
Substituting the given value of H (60 + 500Q²) into the equation will provide the flow rate (Q).
b. The power input to the pump can be calculated using the following formula:
P = (ρQH) / (ηmηo)
Where:
P = Power input to the pump
ρ = Density of the fluid
Q = Flow rate
H = Manometric head
ηm = Manometric efficiency
ηo = Overall efficiency
Substituting the given values into the formula will yield the power input (P) in the appropriate units.
c. The blade angle at the inlet can be determined by using the backward-curved impeller configuration and the percentage of blade occupancy. In a backward-curved impeller, the blades curve away from the direction of rotation. The blade angle at the inlet is given by:
β₁ = β₂ - (180° / π) * (2θ / 360°)
Where:
β₁ = Blade angle at the inlet
β₂ = Blade angle at the outlet
θ = Percentage of blade occupancy (given as 10%)
By substituting the given values into the equation, the blade angle at the inlet (β₁) can be calculated.
learn more about Diameter here:
brainly.com/question/13624974
#SPJ11
A coil has a resistance of 25Ω and the inductance of 30mH is connected to a direct voltage of 5V. Sketch a diagram of the current as a function of time during the first 5 milliseconds after the voltage is switched on.
Answer:
A coil with a resistance of 25 ohms and an inductance of 30 millihenries is connected to a direct voltage of 5 volts.
The current will increase linearly for the first 0.75 milliseconds, and then reach a maximum value of 0.2 amperes. The current will then decrease exponentially.
Explanation:
A coil with a resistance of 25 ohms and an inductance of 30 millihenries is connected to a direct voltage of 5 volts.
The current will initially increase linearly with time, as the coil's inductance resists the flow of current.
However, as the current increases, the coil's impedance will decrease, and the current will eventually reach a maximum value of 0.2 amperes. The current will then decrease exponentially, with a time constant of 0.75 milliseconds.
The following graph shows the current as a function of time during the first 5 milliseconds after the voltage is switched on:
Current (A)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
Time (ms)
0
1
2
3
4
5
The graph shows that the current increases linearly for the first 0.75 milliseconds, and then reaches a maximum value of 0.2 amperes. The current then decreases exponentially, with a time constant of 0.75 milliseconds.
The shape of the current curve is determined by the values of the resistance and inductance. In this case, the resistance is 25 ohms and the inductance is 30 millihenries. This means that the time constant of the circuit is 25 ohms * 30 millihenries = 0.75 milliseconds.
Learn more about Electrical circuits.
https://brainly.com/question/33261228
#SPJ11
In a totally Inelastic collision
colliding objects bounce off of each other
colliding objects stick for a little amount of time then bounce
colliding objects stick together
colliding object change direction separately
A totally inelastic collision, colliding objects stick together, resulting in a loss of kinetic energy and the formation of a combined mass that moves together as one entity.
In a totally inelastic collision, colliding objects stick together. This means that after the collision, the objects become one combined mass and move together as a single entity.
Unlike elastic collisions where kinetic energy is conserved, in a totally inelastic collision, there is a loss of kinetic energy due to deformation and the generation of heat.
During the collision, the colliding objects experience a significant amount of deformation as they come into contact and interact.
The forces between the objects cause them to stick together, and they continue to move in the same direction with a common final velocity. This sticking behavior is characteristic of inelastic collisions.
On the other hand, when objects bounce off each other, it is an indication of an elastic collision where kinetic energy is conserved. In elastic collisions, the objects separate after the collision and continue moving independently with their respective velocities.
In summary, in a totally inelastic collision, colliding objects stick together, resulting in a loss of kinetic energy and the formation of a combined mass that moves together as one entity.
To know more about inelastic refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30103518#
#SPJ11
A partly-full paint can has 0.387 U.S.gallons of paint left in it. (a) What is the volume of the paint, in cubic meters? (b) if all the remaining paint is used to coat a wall evenly (wall area = 10.7 m), how thick is the layer of wet paint? Give your answer in meters. (a) Number i Units (b) Number Units
If all the remaining paint is used to coat a wall evenly Hence, the volume of the paint is 0.0014666 m³.
if all the remaining paint is used to coat a wall evenly (wall area = 10.7 m²), Given, the area of the wall to be coated = 10.7 m²Volume of the paint
= 0.0014666 m³
We know that, ³Therefore, 0.387 U.S gallons of paint
= (0.387 × 0.00378541) m
= 0.0014666 m³
thickness of the layer of wet paint can be found as,Thickness of the layer
= Volume of the paint / Area of the wall
= 0.0014666 / 10.7= 0.000137 m.
Hence, the thickness of the layer of wet paint is 0.000137 meters.
To know more about volume visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1425131
#SPJ11
234 Uranium U has a binding energy of 1779 MeV. What is the mass deficit in atomic mass units? 92 u Need Help? Read It Master It
The mass deficit of Uranium-234 with a binding energy of 1779 MeV is equivalent to approximately 0.0054 atomic mass units.
The mass deficit can be calculated using Einstein's famous equation, E=mc^2, where E is the binding energy, m is the mass deficit, and c is the speed of light. We need to convert the binding energy from MeV to joules by multiplying it by 1.602 × 10^-13, which is the conversion factor between MeV and joules. So, the binding energy in joules is 1779 MeV * 1.602 × 10^-13 J/MeV = 2.845 × 10^-10 J.
Next, we divide the binding energy by the square of the speed of light (c^2) to find the mass deficit:
m = E / c^2 = 2.845 × 10^-10 J / (3 × 10^8 m/s)^2
Calculating this expression gives us the mass deficit in kilograms. To convert it to atomic mass units (u), we can use the fact that 1 atomic mass unit is equal to 1.66 × 10^-27 kg. So, the mass deficit in kilograms divided by this conversion factor will give us the mass deficit in atomic mass units:
m (u) = m (kg) / (1.66 × 10^-27 kg/u)
Performing the calculations, we find that the mass deficit is approximately 0.0054 atomic mass units for Uranium-234 with a binding energy of 1779 MeV.
To learn more about speed of light click here:
brainly.com/question/29216893
#SPJ11