Ex 1 A football factory has a fixed operational cost of $20,000 and spends an additional $1 per football produced. The maximum sale price of each football is set at $21, which will be decreased by 0.1

The function f(z) is not continuous at z = 4 because the left and right limits of f(z) do not exist or are not equal to f(4). Additionally, f(z) is not differentiable at z = 4 because it is not continuous at that point.

In order for a function to be continuous at a specific point, the left and right limits of the function at that point must exist and be equal to the value of the function at that point. In this case, we have two cases to consider: when z < 4 and when z > 4.

For z < 4, the function is defined as f(z) = z + 13. As z approaches 4 from the left, the value of f(z) will approach 4 + 13 = 17. However, when z = 4, the function jumps to a different expression, f(z) = 2√(4z) + 11. Therefore, the left limit does not exist or is not equal to f(4), indicating a discontinuity.

For z > 4, the function is defined as f(z) = 2√(4z) + 11. As z approaches 4 from the right, the value of f(z) will approach 2√(4*4) + 11 = 19. However, when z = 4, the function jumps again to a different expression. Therefore, the right limit does not exist or is not equal to f(4), indicating a discontinuity.

Since f(z) is not continuous at z = 4, it cannot be differentiable at that point. Differentiability requires continuity, and in this case, the function fails to meet the criteria for continuity at z = 4.

Learn more about right limits here:

https://brainly.com/question/29127494

#SPJ11

After substituting 3 csc() for X, the expression 2.9 simplifies to approximately 0.96667.

To simplify the expression 2.9 after substituting 3 csc() for X, we need to rewrite 2.9 in terms of csc().

Recall that csc() is the reciprocal of sin(). Since we are given X = 3 csc(), we can rewrite it as sin(X) = 1/3.

Now, we substitute sin(X) = 1/3 into the expression 2.9: 2.9 = 2.9 * sin(X)

Substituting sin(X) = 1/3: 2.9 = 2.9 * (1/3)

Simplifying the multiplication: 2.9 = 0.96667

Therefore, after substituting 3 csc() for X, the simplified expression for 2.9 is approximately equal to 0.96667.

LEARN MORE ABOUT expression here: brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

The value of `c3` is `1` for the Taylor series of the function.

We are given the function `f(x) = x + sin(x)` and the Taylor series expansion of this function about `a = 0` is given as: `co + ci(x – a) + c2(x – a)²+...+cn(x – a)n`.Let `a = 0`.

Then we have:`f(x) = x + sin(x)`Taylor series expansion at `a = 0`:`f(x) = co + ci(x – 0) + c2(x – 0)² + c3(x – 0)³ + ... + cn(x – 0)n`

The Taylor series in mathematics is a representation of a function as an infinite sum of terms that are computed from the derivatives of the function at a particular point. It offers a function's approximate behaviour at that point.

Simplifying this Taylor series expansion: `f(x) = [tex]co + ci x + c2x^2 + c3x^3 + ... + cnx^n + ... + 0`[/tex]

The coefficient of x³ is c3, thus we can equate the coefficient of [tex]x^3[/tex] in f(x) and in the Taylor series expansion of f(x).

Equating the coefficients of x³ we get:`1 = 0 + 0 + 0 + c3`or `c3 = 1`.

Therefore, `c3 = 1`.Hence, the value of `c3` is `1`.

Learn more about taylor series here:

https://brainly.com/question/32235538

#SPJ11

The limit [tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8[/tex] as x approaches infinity is 1

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8[/tex]

Factor out 16 from the numerator of the expression

So, we have

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8 = \lim _{x\to \infty }\left(16 * \frac{x}{3+16x}\right)^8[/tex]

Rewrite as

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8 = \lim _{x\to \infty }\left(16 *\frac{x}{3+16x}\right)^8[/tex]

Divide the numerator and the denominator by the variable x

So, we have

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8 = \lim _{x\to \infty }\left(16 * \frac{1}{3/x+16}\right)^8[/tex]

Substitute ∝ for x

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8 = \left(16 * \frac{1}{3/\infty +16}\right)^8[/tex]

Evaluate the limit

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8 = \left(16 * \frac{1}{16}\right)^8[/tex]

So, we have

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8 = \left(1\right)^8[/tex]

Evaluate the exponent

[tex]\lim _{x\to \infty }\left(\frac{16x}{3+16x}\right)^8[/tex] =  1

Hence, the value of the limit is 1

Read more about limits at

https://brainly.com/question/5313449

#SPJ4

The Taylor polynomials [tex]T_f(x) and T_g(x)[/tex] centered at x = 2 for [tex]f(x) = e^x + e[/tex] and [tex]g(x) = x^3 - 7x^2 + 9x - 2[/tex], respectively, are:

[tex]T_f(x) = e^2 + (x - 2)e^2[/tex]

[tex]T_g(x) = -46 + 38(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 + (x - 2)^3[/tex]

To calculate the Taylor polynomial T_f(x) centered at x = 2, we need to find the values of the coefficients A and B.

The coefficient A is the value of f(2), which is e^2 + e.

The coefficient B is the derivative of f(x) evaluated at x = 2, which is e^2. Therefore, the Taylor polynomial [tex]T_f(x)[/tex]is given by:

[tex]T_f(x) = e^2 + (x - 2)e^2[/tex]

To calculate the Taylor polynomial T_g(x) centered at x = 2, we need to find the values of the coefficients D, E, and F. The coefficient D is the value of g(2), which is -46.

The coefficient E is the derivative of g(x) evaluated at x = 2, which is 38.

The coefficient F is the second derivative of g(x) evaluated at x = 2, which is 2. Therefore, the Taylor polynomial T_g(x) is given by:

[tex]T_g(x) = -46 + 38(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 + (x - 2)^3[/tex]

Hence, the Taylor polynomial T_f(x) is e^2 + (x - 2)e^2, and the Taylor polynomial [tex]T_g(x) is -46 + 38(x - 2) + 2(x - 2)^2 + (x - 2)^3[/tex].

Learn more about Taylor polynomial here:

https://brainly.com/question/32525862

#SPJ11

The doubling time for the population of fruit flies is approximately 4.4 hours. It will take around 28.6 hours for the population size to reach 440.

To find the doubling time, we can use the formula for exponential growth:

N = N0 * (2^(t / D))

Where:

N is the final population size,

N0 is the initial population size,

t is the time in hours, and

D is the doubling time.

We are given N0 = 350 and N = 387 after 20 hours. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

387 = 350 * (2^(20 / D))

Dividing both sides by 350 and taking the logarithm to the base 2, we have:

log2(387 / 350) = 20 / D

Solving for D, we get:

D ≈ 20 / (log2(387 / 350))

Calculating this value, the doubling time is approximately 4.4 hours.

For part (b), we need to find the time it takes for the population size to reach 440. Using the same formula, we have:

440 = 350 * (2^(t / 4.4))

Dividing both sides by 350 and taking the logarithm to the base 2, we obtain:

log2(440 / 350) = t / 4.4

Solving for t, we get:

t ≈ 4.4 * log2(440 / 350)

Calculating this value, the population size will reach 440 after approximately 28.6 hours.

Learn more about logarithm here:

https://brainly.com/question/30226560

#SPJ11

Complete Question :-
A population of fruit flies grows exponentially. At the beginning of the experiment, the population size is 350.After 20 hours, the population size is 387. a) Find the doubling time for this population of fruit flies. (Round your answer to the nearest tenth of an hour.) hours. b) After how many hours will the population size reach 440? (Round your answer to the nearest tenth of an hour.) hours Submit Question.

a) To approximate V288 using differentials, we can start with a known value close to 288, such as 289, we can use the differential to estimate the change in V as x changes from 289 to 288. The differential of V(x) = √x is given by[tex]dV = (1/2√x) dx.[/tex]

Finally, we add the differential to V(289) to approximate [tex]V288: V288 ≈[/tex][tex]V(289) + dV = √289 + (-8.5) = 17 - 8.5 = 8.5.[/tex]

b) To approximate ln(3.45) using differentials, we can use the differential of the natural logarithm function. The differential of ln(x) is given by d(ln(x)) = (1/x) dx.

[tex]Using x = 3.45, we have d(ln(x)) = (1/3.45) dx[/tex].

Finally, we add the differential to ln(3.45) to approximate the value: [tex]ln(3.45) + d(ln(x)) ≈ ln(3.45) + 0.00289855.[/tex]

learn more about:- differentials here

https://brainly.com/question/31383100

#SPJ11

To determine the convergence or divergence of the series:Therefore, the given series converges.

Σ arctan[tex](n) / (n^2.1)[/tex] from n = 1 to infinity,

we can use the comparison test.

The comparison test states that if 0 ≤ a_n ≤ b_n for all n and the series Σ b_n converges, then the series Σ a_n also converges. If the series Σ b_n diverges, then the series Σ a_n also diverges.

Let's apply the comparison test to the given series:

For n ≥ 1, we have 0 ≤ arctan(n) ≤ π/2 since arctan(n) is an increasing function.

Now, let's consider the series[tex]Σ (π/2) / (n^2.1)[/tex]:

[tex]Σ (π/2) / (n^2.1)[/tex] converges as it is a p-series with p = 2.1 > 1.

Since 0 ≤ arctan[tex](n) ≤ (π/2) / (n^2.1)[/tex] for all n ≥ 1, and the series[tex]Σ (π/2) / (n^2.1)[/tex]converges, we can conclude that the series Σ arctan[tex](n) / (n^2.1)[/tex] also converges.

To know more about convergence click the link below:

brainly.com/question/32326242

#SPJ11

(a) To expand both sides and verify the given equation 2^(2ex - e^(-x)) = (1 + 6^(79x))(10^(-9x)), we can use the properties of exponential and logarithmic functions.

Starting with the left side of the equation, we have 2^(2ex - e^(-x)). Using the property that (a^b)^c = a^(b*c), we can rewrite this as (2^2)^(ex - e^(-x)) = 4^(ex - e^(-x)). Then, applying the property that a^(b - c) = a^b / a^c, we get 4^(ex) / 4^(e^(-x)). Moving on to the right side of the equation, we have (1 + 6^(79x))(10^(-9x)). This expression does not simplify further.Now, we can compare the two sides and verify their equality:4^(ex) / 4^(e^(-x)) = (1 + 6^(79x))(10^(-9x)).

(b) The current equation is 4^(ex) / 4^(e^(-x)) = (1 + 6^(79x))(10^(-9x)). In order to solve this equation, we need to isolate the variable x. To do that, we can take the logarithm of both sides. Taking the logarithm of both sides, we have: log(4^(ex) / 4^(e^(-x))) = log((1 + 6^(79x))(10^(-9x))).

Using the logarithmic property log(a / b) = log(a) - log(b) and log(a^b) = b * log(a), we can simplify the left side:(ex) * log(4) - (e^(-x)) * log(4) = log((1 + 6^(79x))(10^(-9x))).Next, we can distribute the logarithm on the right side:(ex) * log(4) - (e^(-x)) * log(4) = log(1 + 6^(79x)) + log(10^(-9x)). Simplifying further, we have: (ex) * log(4) - (e^(-x)) * log(4) = log(1 + 6^(79x)) - 9x * log(10).At this point, we have transformed the original equation into an equation involving logarithmic functions. Solving for x in this equation might require numerical methods or approximations, as it involves both exponential and logarithmic terms.

To learn more about logarithmic property click here:

brainly.com/question/30953356

#SPJ11

The answer is "n+1" because the expression "An+1" represents the term that comes after the term "An" in the sequence.

In this case, since An = 7, the next term would be A(n+1). The expression "n!" represents the factorial of n,

which is not relevant to this particular question.

learn more about:-  An+1 here

https://brainly.com/question/27517323

#SPJ11

To find the first partial derivatives of the expression w + 2√(x - z) + yw + 8w^2 - 9 with respect to the variables x, y, and z, we apply the chain rule and product rule where necessary. The first partial derivatives are ∂w/∂x = (∂w/∂x) / 2√(x - z) + y * (∂w/∂x) + 16w * (∂w/∂x), ∂w/∂y = (∂w/∂y) / 2√(x - z) + w, and ∂w/∂z = (∂w/∂z) / 2√(x - z) - (∂w/∂z) / 2(x - z) + 8w.

To differentiate the given expression implicitly, we need to differentiate each term with respect to the variables involved and apply the chain rule when necessary. Let's differentiate the expression w + 2√(x - z) + yw + 8w^2 - 9 with respect to each variable:

∂w/∂x: The first term w does not contain x, so its derivative with respect to x is 0.

The second term 2√(x - z) has a square root, so we apply the chain rule: (∂w/∂x) * (1/2√(x - z)) * (1) = (∂w/∂x) / 2√(x - z).

The third term yw is a product of two variables, so we apply the product rule: (∂w/∂x) * y + w * (∂y/∂x).

The fourth term 8w^2 is a power of w, so we apply the chain rule: 2 * 8w * (∂w/∂x) = 16w * (∂w/∂x).

The fifth term -9 is a constant, so its derivative with respect to x is 0.

Putting it all together, we have:

∂w/∂x = (∂w/∂x) / 2√(x - z) + y * (∂w/∂x) + 16w * (∂w/∂x) + 0

Simplifying the expression, we get:

∂w/∂x = (∂w/∂x) / 2√(x - z) + y * (∂w/∂x) + 16w * (∂w/∂x)

Similarly, we can differentiate with respect to y and z to find the first partial derivatives ∂w/∂y and ∂w/∂z.

∂w/∂y = (∂w/∂y) / 2√(x - z) + w

∂w/∂z = (∂w/∂z) / 2√(x - z) - (∂w/∂z) / 2(x - z) + 8w

These are the first partial derivatives of w with respect to x, y, and z, obtained by differentiating the given expression implicitly.

Learn more about partial derivative here: https://brainly.com/question/31827770

#SPJ11

The first approximation, denoted as oren, can be written as the product of c and d. The greatest common divisor of c and d is 1, meaning they have no common factors other than 1.

The specific values of c and d are not provided, so you would need to provide the values or determine them based on the context of the problem.

Regarding the variable u, it is not specified in your question, so it is unclear what u represents. If u is related to the approximation oren, you would need to provide additional information or context for its calculation or meaning.

Learn more about greatest common divisor here: brainly.in/question/4154212
#SPJ11

1) The simplified expression for 5p - 5 + 10p - 10 + р - 9p² is -9p² + 15p - 15.

To simplify the expression, we combine like terms. The like terms in this expression are the terms with the same exponent of p. Therefore, we add the coefficients of these terms.

For the terms with p, we have 5p + 10p = 15p.

For the constant terms, we have -5 - 10 - 15 = -30.

Thus, the simplified expression becomes -9p² + 15p - 15.

2) The simplified expression for x² + 16x ÷ (x + 5)(x + 4) is (x + 4).

To simplify the expression, we factor the numerator and denominator.

The numerator x² + 16x cannot be factored further.

The denominator (x + 5)(x + 4) is already factored.

We can cancel out the common factors of (x + 4) in the numerator and denominator.

Thus, the simplified expression becomes (x + 4).

To know more about inequality, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20383699#

#SPJ4

Answer:

c. 44 mi.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve for the total distance hiked by Jared, we need to add all the given distance and with the distance when he returned to the starting point.

Use the illustration below for reference.

The last point given and the starting point forms a right triangle. We can then use Pythagorean theorem on this case.

The right triangle formed has legs of 8 mi (10mi - 2mi) and 15 mi (4mi + 11mi).

c² = a² + b²

where a and b are the legs of the triangle and c is the hypotenuse.

Based on the illustration, a and b are 8mi and 15mi while c is represented as d

Let's solve!

c² = a² + b²

d² = (8mi)² + (15mi)²

d² = 64 mi² + 225 mi²

d² = 289 mi²

Extract the square root on both sides of the equation

d = 17 mi

Add all the given distance by 17 mi

Total distance = 10mi + 11mi + 2mi + 4 mi + 17 mi

Total distance = 44 mi

The area under the curve of the function f(x) = 9 - y^2 over the interval x = 1 to x = 3 is approximately 11.75 square units

To approximate the area under the curve, we can use the method of Riemann sums. In this case, we divide the interval [1, 3] into four subintervals of equal width. The width of each subinterval is (3 - 1) / 4 = 0.5.

We can then evaluate the function at the endpoints of each subinterval and multiply the function value by the width of the subinterval. Adding up all these products gives us the approximate area under the curve.

For the first subinterval, when x = 1, the function value is f(1) = 9 - 1^2 = 8. For the second subinterval, when x = 1.5, the function value is f(1.5) = 9 - 1.5^2 = 6.75. Similarly, for the third and fourth subintervals, the function values are f(2) = 9 - 2^2 = 5 and f(2.5) = 9 - 2.5^2 = 3.75, respectively.

Multiplying each function value by the width of the subinterval (0.5) and summing them up, we get the approximate area under the curve as follows:

Area ≈ (0.5 × 8) + (0.5 × 6.75) + (0.5 × 5) + (0.5 × 3.75) = 4 + 3.375 + 2.5 + 1.875 = 11.75.

Therefore, the area under the curve of the function f(x) = 9 - y^2 from x = 1 to x = 3, approximated using four subintervals, is approximately 11.75 square units.

Learn more about subinterval hre:

https://brainly.com/question/27258724

#SPJ11

The statement "If f(x) is a differentiable function that is positive for all x, then f'(x) is increasing for all x" is true.

If a function f(x) is differentiable and positive for all x, it means that the function is continuously increasing. This implies that as x increases, the corresponding values of f(x) also increase.

The derivative of a function, denoted as f'(x), represents the rate of change of the function at any given point. When f(x) is positive for all x, it indicates that the function is getting steeper as x increases, resulting in a positive slope.

Since the derivative f'(x) gives us the instantaneous rate of change of the function, a positive derivative indicates an increasing rate of change. In other words, as x increases, the derivative f'(x) becomes larger, signifying that the function is getting steeper at an increasing rate.

Therefore, we can conclude that if f(x) is a differentiable function that is positive for all x, then f'(x) is increasing for all x.

Learn more about "derivative ":

https://brainly.com/question/23819325

#SPJ11

The dimension the  a box with a square end the largest possible volume is 10 ×10 × 23.3

First, we will need to complete the question.

Let us assume that its dimensions are h by h by w and its girth is 2h + 2w.

Volume = h²w

Where h is the length

w is the girth

From the information given, we have;

Length + girth = 90

w+(2h+2w) = 90

2h + 3w = 90

Make 'w' the subject

w = 90- 2h/3

w = 30 - 2h/3

Substitute the values

Volume = h²(30 - 2h/3)

expand the bracket

Volume = 30h² - 2h³/3

Find the differential value

Volume = 60h - 6h²

h = 10

Substitute the values

w =  30 - 2h/3

w = 30 - 2(10)/3

w = 30 - 20/3

w = 23.3 in

The dimensions are 10 ×10 × 23.3

Learn more about volume at: https://brainly.com/question/1972490

#SPJ1

(1/3z)(d³e^zb - d³e^za - c³e^zb + c³e^za). The given double integral is ∬ x²e^zy dxdy. Reversing the order of integration, we first integrate with respect to x and then with respect to y. The final solution will involve the evaluation of the antiderivative and substitution of limits in the reversed order.

To reverse the order of integration, we need to determine the limits of integration for y and x. The original limits of integration are not provided in the question, so we will assume finite limits for simplicity. Let's denote the limits for y as a to b and the limits for x as c to d.

∬ x²e^zy dxdy = ∫[a to b] ∫[c to d] x²e^zy dxdy

First, let's integrate with respect to x:

∫[a to b] ∫[c to d] x²e^zy dx dy

Integrating x² with respect to x gives (1/3)x³e^zy. We substitute the limits of integration for x:

∫[a to b] [(1/3)(d³e^zy - c³e^zy)] dy

Next, let's integrate with respect to y:

∫[a to b] [(1/3)(d³e^zy - c³e^zy)] dy

Integrating e^zy with respect to y gives (1/z)e^zy. We substitute the limits of integration for y:

(1/3z)[(d³e^zb - c³e^zb) - (d³e^za - c³e^za)]

Simplifying further:

(1/3z)(d³e^zb - d³e^za - c³e^zb + c³e^za)

This is the final solution after reversing the order of integration.

Note: If the original limits of integration were provided, the solution would involve substituting those limits into the final expression for a specific numerical answer.

Learn more about integration here:

brainly.com/question/31744185

#SPJ11

To find the area between the given curves, we need to determine the points of intersection and integrate the difference between the curves over that interval. The specific steps and calculations for each pair of curves are as follows:

y = 4x – x^2, y = 3:

Find the points of intersection by setting the two equations equal to each other and solving for x. Then integrate the difference between the curves over that interval.

y = 2x^2 – 25, y = x^2:

Find the points of intersection by setting the two equations equal to each other and solving for x. Then integrate the difference between the curves over that interval.

y = 7x – 2x^2, y = 3x:

Find the points of intersection by setting the two equations equal to each other and solving for x. Then integrate the difference between the curves over that interval.

y = 2x^2 - 6, y = 10 – 2x^2:

Find the points of intersection by setting the two equations equal to each other and solving for x. Then integrate the difference between the curves over that interval.

y = x^3, y = x^2 + 2x:

Find the points of intersection by setting the two equations equal to each other and solving for x. Then integrate the difference between the curves over that interval.

y = x^3, y = ...

To find the area between two curves, we first need to determine the points of intersection. This can be done by setting the equations of the curves equal to each other and solving for x. Once we have the x-values of the points of intersection, we can integrate the difference between the curves over that interval to find the area.

For example, let's consider the first pair of curves: y = 4x – x^2 and y = 3. To find the points of intersection, we set the two equations equal to each other:

4x – x^2 = 3

Simplifying this equation, we get:

x^2 - 4x + 3 = 0

Factoring or using the quadratic formula, we find that x = 1 and x = 3 are the points of intersection.

Next, we integrate the difference between the curves over the interval [1, 3] to find the area:

Area = ∫(4x - x^2 - 3) dx, from x = 1 to x = 3

We perform the integration and evaluate the definite integral to find the area between the curves.

Similarly, we follow these steps for each pair of curves to find the respective areas between them.

Learn more about area here : brainly.com/question/30307509

#SPJ11

The explicit formula for the arithmetic sequence in this problem is given as follows:

d) [tex]a_n = 9 - 6(n - 1)[/tex] where n ≥ 1

An arithmetic sequence is a sequence of values in which the difference between consecutive terms is constant and is called common difference d.

The explicit formula of an arithmetic sequence is given by the explicit formula presented as follows:

[tex]a_n = a_1 + (n - 1)d, n \geq 1[/tex]

In which [tex]a_1[/tex] is the first term of the arithmetic sequence.

The parameters for this problem are given as follows:

[tex]a_1 = 9, d = -6[/tex]

Hence option d is the correct option for this problem.

More can be learned about arithmetic sequences at https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ1

To find the maximum value of the function f(x, y) = x + y - (x - y)^2 on the triangular region defined by x = 0, y = 0, and x + y ≤ 1, we need to consider the critical points and the boundary of the region.

First, let's find the critical points by taking the partial derivatives of f(x, y) with respect to x and y and setting them equal to zero:

∂f/∂x = 1 - 2(x - y) = 0

∂f/∂y = 1 + 2(x - y) = 0

Solving these equations simultaneously, we get x = 1/2 and y = 1/2 as the critical point.

Next, we need to evaluate the function at the critical point and at the boundary of the region:

f(1/2, 1/2) = 1/2 + 1/2 - (1/2 - 1/2)^2 = 1

f(0, 0) = 0

f(0, 1) = 1

f(1, 0) = 1

The maximum value of the function occurs at the point (1/2, 1/2) and has a value of 1.

you can elaborate on the process of finding the critical points, evaluating the function at the critical points and boundary, and explaining why the maximum value occurs at (1/2, 1/2).

To learn more about critical points : brainly.com/question/32077588

#SPJ11

The probability of selecting two blue marbles without replacement is 1/6, and the probability of selecting three blue marbles without replacement is 1/35. The fewest number of marbles that must have been in the bag before any were drawn is 36.

Let's assume there are x marbles in the bag. The probability of selecting two blue marbles without replacement can be calculated using the following equation: (x - 1)/(x) * (x - 2)/(x - 1) = 1/6. Simplifying this equation gives (x - 2)/(x) = 1/6. Solving for x, we find x = 12.

Similarly, the probability of selecting three blue marbles without replacement can be calculated using the equation: (x - 1)/(x) * (x - 2)/(x - 1) * (x - 3)/(x - 2) = 1/35. Simplifying this equation gives (x - 3)/(x) = 1/35. Solving for x, we find x = 36.

Therefore, the fewest number of marbles that must have been in the bag before any were drawn is 36.

Learn more about probability here: https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The limit of the given expression does not exist.

To evaluate the limit of the given expression as x approaches infinity, we need to analyze the highest power of x in the numerator and the denominator. In this case, the highest power of x in the numerator is 4, while in the denominator, it is 4x^4.

As x approaches infinity, the term 4x^4 dominates the expression, and all other terms become insignificant compared to it. Therefore, we can simplify the expression by dividing every term by x^4:

(20x^4 - 3x + 6) / (4x^4 + x^3 + x^2 + x + 6)

As x approaches infinity, the numerator's leading term becomes 20x^4, and the denominator's leading term becomes 4x^4. By dividing both terms by x^4, the expression can be simplified further:

(20 - 3/x^3 + 6/x^4) / (4 + 1/x + 1/x^2 + 1/x^3 + 6/x^4)

As x goes to infinity, the terms with negative powers of x tend to zero. However, the term 3/x^3 and the constant term 20 in the numerator result in a non-zero value.

Meanwhile, in the denominator, the leading term is 4, which remains constant. Consequently, the expression does not converge to a single value, indicating that the limit does not exist (DNE).

Learn more about limit of an expression:

https://brainly.com/question/28969415

#SPJ11

The magnitude of the sum of vectors u and v is approximately 13.691.

To find the sum of vectors u and v, we need to use the Law of Cosines. The Law of Cosines states that for a triangle with sides a, b, and c and the angle opposite side c, we have the equation:

c^2 = a^2 + b^2 - 2ab cos(C)

In our case, vectors u and v are placed tail-to-tail, and we want to find the sum of these vectors. Let's denote the magnitude of the sum of u and v as |u + v|, and the angle between them as θ.

Given that |u| = 8, |v| = 15, and θ = 65°, we can apply the Law of Cosines:

|u + v|^2 = |u|^2 + |v|^2 - 2|u||v|cos(θ)

Substituting the given values, we have:

|u + v|^2 = 8^2 + 15^2 - 2(8)(15)cos(65°)

Calculating the right side of the equation:

|u + v|^2 = 64 + 225 - 240cos(65°)

Using a calculator to evaluate cos(65°), we get:

|u + v|^2 ≈ 64 + 225 - 240(0.4226182617)

|u + v|^2 ≈ 64 + 225 - 101.304

|u + v|^2 ≈ 187.696

Taking the square root of both sides, we find:

|u + v| ≈ √187.696

|u + v| ≈ 13.691

Therefore, the magnitude of the sum of vectors u and v is approximately 13.691.

Learn more about vector at https://brainly.com/question/32180657

#SPJ11

The value of the integral ∫√(2) dx from 0 to 49 using the substitution x = 7tanθ is (7π√(2))/4.

To evaluate the integral ∫√(2) dx from 0 to 49, the substitution x = 7tanθ will be the most helpful.

Let's substitute x = 7tanθ, then find dx in terms of dθ:

[tex]x = 7tanθ[/tex]

Differentiating both sides with respect to θ using the chain rule:

[tex]dx = 7sec^2θ dθ[/tex]

Now, we rewrite the integral using the substitution[tex]x = 7tanθ and dx = 7sec^2θ dθ:[/tex]

[tex]∫√(2) dx = ∫√(2) (7sec^2θ) dθ[/tex]

Next, we need to find the limits of integration when x goes from 0 to 49. Substituting these limits using the substitution x = 7tanθ:

When x = 0, 0 = 7tanθ

θ = 0

When x = 49, 49 = 7tanθ

tanθ = 7/7 = 1

θ = π/4

Now, we can rewrite the integral using the substitution and limits of integration:

[tex]∫√(2) dx = ∫√(2) (7sec^2θ) dθ= 7∫√(2) sec^2θ dθ[/tex]

[tex]= 7∫√(2) dθ (since sec^2θ = 1/cos^2θ = 1/(1 - sin^2θ) = 1/(1 - (tan^2θ/1 + tan^2θ)) = 1/(1 + tan^2θ))[/tex]

The integral of √(2) dθ is simply √(2)θ, so we have:

[tex]7∫√(2) dθ = 7√(2)θ[/tex]

Evaluating the integral from θ = 0 to θ = π/4:

[tex]7√(2)θ evaluated from 0 to π/4= 7√(2)(π/4) - 7√(2)(0)= (7π√(2))/4[/tex]

Learn more about the integral here:

https://brainly.com/question/17015884

#SPJ11

∫ [(9 - 9t)i + 2√(t)j + 3] dt = (9t - (9/2)t^2)i + ((4/3)t^(3/2))j + (3t)k + C

∫ (1/6) [(9 sec(t) tan(t))i + (2 tan(t))j + (3 sin(t) cos(t) - (t/4))k] dt = (3/2) sec(t) - (1/3) ln| cos(t)| + (9/8) sin^2(t) - (t^2/32) + C'

To evaluate the given integrals, let's calculate each term separately.

Integral 1:

∫ [(9 - 9t)i + 2√(t)j + 3] dt

Integrating each term separately, we get:

∫ (9 - 9t) dt = 9t - (9/2)t^2 + C1

∫ 2√(t) dt = (4/3)t^(3/2) + C2

∫ 3 dt = 3t + C3

Combining the results, we have:

∫ [(9 - 9t)i + 2√(t)j + 3] dt = (9t - (9/2)t^2)i + ((4/3)t^(3/2))j + (3t)k + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Integral 2:

∫ (1/6) [(9 sec(t) tan(t))i + (2 tan(t))j + (3 sin(t) cos(t) - (t/4))k] dt

Integrating each term separately, we get:

∫ (9 sec(t) tan(t)) dt = 9 sec(t) + C4

∫ (2 tan(t)) dt = -2 ln| cos(t)| + C5

∫ (3 sin(t) cos(t) - (t/4)) dt = (3/2) sin^2(t) - (1/8)t^2 + C6

Combining the results, we have:

∫ (1/6) [(9 sec(t) tan(t))i + (2 tan(t))j + (3 sin(t) cos(t) - (t/4))k] dt = (3/2) sec(t) - (1/3) ln| cos(t)| + (9/8) sin^2(t) - (t^2/32) + C'

where C' is the constant of integration.

Learn more about Intergals: https://brainly.com/question/30094386

#SPJ11

Table B likely has a greater output value for x = 10.

We can see that for both tables, as x increases, the corresponding y values also increase.

Therefore, for x = 10, we need to determine the corresponding y values in both tables.

In Table A, we don't have values beyond x = 3. Thus, we can't determine the y value for x = 10 using Table A.

In Table B, the pattern suggests that the y values continue to increase as x increases.

We can estimate that the y value for x = 10 in Table B would be greater than the highest known y value (2.197) at x = 3.

Based on this reasoning, we can conclude that the function represented by Table B likely has a greater output value for x = 10.

Learn more about linear Relation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30670099

#SPJ1

The given curve is represented by the equation f(x) = √[tex](x^2 - 4)[/tex]. The domain of the curve is (-∞, -2] ∪ [2, +∞), and it has two intercepts: (-2, 0) and (2, 0).

To determine the domain of the curve, we need to consider the values of x for which the function f(x) is defined. In this case, the square root function (√) is defined only for non-negative real numbers. Therefore, we need to find the values of x that make the expression inside the square root non-negative.

The expression inside the square root, x^2 - 4, must be greater than or equal to zero. Solving this inequality, we get[tex]x^2[/tex]≥ 4, which implies x ≤ -2 or x ≥ 2. Combining these two intervals, we find that the domain of the curve is (-∞, -2] ∪ [2, +∞).

To find the intercepts of the curve, we set f(x) = 0 and solve for x. Setting √[tex](x^2 - 4)[/tex] = 0, we square both sides to get x^2 - 4 = 0. Adding 4 to both sides and taking the square root, we find x = ±2. Therefore, the curve intersects the x-axis at x = -2 and x = 2, giving us the intercepts (-2, 0) and (2, 0) respectively.

Learn more about domain here:

https://brainly.com/question/30133157

#SPJ11

The surface integral S Sszds =  (-2/3)π2.

1: Parametrize the surface

Let (x, y, z) = (sinθcosφ, sinθsinφ, -cosθ), such that 0 ≤ θ ≤ π and 0 ≤ φ ≤ 2π.

2: Determine the limits of integration

For 0 ≤ θ ≤ π and 0 ≤ φ ≤ 2π, we know that

                                  0 ≤ sinθ ≤ 1 and  0 ≤ cosθ ≤ 1

3: Rewrite the integral in terms of the parameters

The integral can now be written as follows:

                 S Sszds =  ∫0π∫02π sinθcosφsinθsinφcosθ  dθdφ

4: Perform the integrations

The integral can now be evaluated as:

                           S Sszds =  (-2/3)π2

To know more about integral refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31109342#

#SPJ11

The limits approach different finite values as x approaches the same value in the domain. Hence the given limit doesn't exist.

Given f(x) = 2x - 5.

We need to evaluate lim Ax-+0 for the function f(x+4x)-S (X).

Also, we need to find the value of "a" and "b" for which the limit exists both as x approaches 1 and as x approaches $\frac{1}{2}$ .

Solution: Given function is f(x+4x)-S (X)

Now, f(x+4x) = 2(x+4x)-5 = 10x-5Also, S(X) = x + 4 + 1/x

Take the limit as Ax-+0lim 10x-5 - x - 4 - 1/x

We know that as x approaches 0, 1/x will tend to infinity and hence limit will be infinity as well.

Therefore, the given limit doesn't exist.

As we know, $f(x)=2x-5$ and we have to find the value of "a" and "b" for which the limit exists both as x approaches 1 and as x approaches $\frac{1}{2}$ .

Therefore, we have to find the values of a and b such that f(1) and f($\frac{1}{2}$) are finite and equal when evaluated at the same limit.

So, for x = 1;

f(x) = 2(1)-5

= -3And for

x = $\frac{1}{2}$;

f(x) = 2($\frac{1}{2}$) - 5 = -4

To know more about the domain

https://brainly.com/question/26098895

#SPJ11