If b, c, d are integers such that b > 3 and b 2i + c 11 13 = 9+ + itd 2 3 ***** 15 4 then be c=1 Jand d=

The average cost function ©(x) is given by ©(x) = 175/x + 2.6.To find the average cost function, we need to divide the total cost function (C(x)) by the quantity (x). The average cost function ©(x) is calculated by dividing the total cost (C(x)) by the quantity (x).

Start with the cost function:

C(x) = 175 + 2.6x. The average cost is obtained by dividing the total cost (C(x)) by the quantity (x). Mathematically, we express this as: ©(x) = C(x) / x

Substitute the cost function (C(x)) into the equation: ©(x) = (175 + 2.6x) / x

Simplify the expression: To simplify, we can split the fraction into two terms: ©(x) = 175/x + 2.6

The term 175/x represents the portion of the cost that is attributed to each unit produced, while 2.6 represents a fixed cost that remains constant regardless of the quantity produced.

Therefore, the average cost function is given by ©(x) = 175/x + 2.6. This function represents the average cost per unit as a function of the quantity produced (x). The first term, 175/x, captures the variable cost per unit, while the second term, 2.6, represents the fixed cost per unit.

to know more about average cost function click: brainly.com/question/29360248

#SPJ11

To prove the theorem "If n is an odd integer and m is an odd integer, then n + m is even" by contradiction, the set of premises would be: n is an odd integer and m is an odd integer.

To prove a statement by contradiction, we assume the opposite of the statement and show that it leads to a contradiction or inconsistency. In this case, we assume that the sum n + m is odd.

If we choose option (d) "n + m is odd" as our set of premises, we are assuming the opposite of what we want to prove. This approach would not lead to a contradiction and therefore would not be suitable for a proof by contradiction.

Instead, we need to start with the premises that n is an odd integer and m is an odd integer. From these premises, we can proceed to show that their sum n + m is indeed even. By assuming the opposite and arriving at a contradiction, we establish the truth of the original statement.

Therefore, the correct set of premises for a proof by contradiction in this case is option (b) "n is odd, m is odd." This allows us to arrive at a contradiction when assuming the sum n + m is odd, leading to the conclusion that n + m must be even.

Learn more about contradiction here:

https://brainly.com/question/29098604

#SPJ11

To find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region enclosed by [tex]y = x^2, x = 1, x = 2, and y = 0[/tex] about the y-axis, we can use the disk method.

The given region forms a bounded region in the xy-plane between the curves [tex]y = x^2, x = 1, x = 2, and y = 0.[/tex]

To calculate the volume, we integrate the area of infinitesimally thin disks along the y-axis from [tex]y = 0 to y = 1.[/tex]

The radius of each disk is given by the x-coordinate of the corresponding point on the curve [tex]y = x^2.[/tex]

Set up the integral for the volume using the disk method: [tex]V = ∫[0,1] π(x^2)^2 dy.[/tex]

Integrate with respect to[tex]y: V = π[x^4/5[/tex]] evaluated from[tex]y = 0 to y = 1.[/tex]

Substitute the limits and evaluate the integral: [tex]V = π[(2^4/5) - (1^4/5)].[/tex]

Simplify the expression:[tex]V = π[16/5 - 1/5].[/tex]

Finally, calculate the volume: [tex]V = (15/5)π = 3π.[/tex]

Therefore, the volume of the solid generated by revolving the given region about the y-axis is 3π.

learn more about:- volume of solid here

https://brainly.com/question/23705404

#SPJ11

The work done in pulling the whole cable to the bridge is 2000J or 2kJ

Work is defined as the force applied to an object multiplied by the distance the object moves. In this case, the force is the weight of the cable, which is equal to the mass of the cable times the acceleration due to gravity. The distance the object moves is the length of the cable.

Therefore, the work done in pulling the whole cable to the bridge is:

Work = Force * Distance

Work = Mass * Acceleration due to gravity * Distance

Work = 200  * 9.8 * 10

Work = 2000 J

Work = 2kJ

Learn more work done here;

https://brainly.com/question/25573309

#SPJ1

The convergence of iterative methods to solve the system cannot be guaranteed based on the diagonal dominance of the coefficient matrix, A.

Diagonal dominance is a property of the coefficient matrix in a linear system, where the magnitude of each diagonal element is greater than or equal to the sum of the magnitudes of the other elements in the same row. It is often used as a condition to guarantee convergence of iterative methods. However, in this case, we need to examine the diagonal dominance of the specific coefficient matrix, A, to determine convergence.

By calculating the row sums, we find that the magnitude of the diagonal elements in A is not greater than the sum of the magnitudes of the other elements in their respective rows. Therefore, A does not satisfy the condition of diagonal dominance. This means that the convergence of iterative methods, such as Jacobi or Gauss-Seidel, cannot be guaranteed for this system.

Without the guarantee of convergence, it becomes more challenging to predict the behavior and accuracy of iterative methods. The lack of diagonal dominance indicates that the matrix A may have significant off-diagonal influence, causing the iterative methods to diverge or converge slowly. In such cases, alternative techniques or preconditioning strategies may be required to ensure convergence or improve the efficiency of the iterative methods.

Learn more about convergence here:

https://brainly.com/question/28202684

#SPJ11

The optimum output variety combination would be achieved by producing 100 units of output with a variety level of 50, which is 0.975.

Determining the optimal combination of yield and diversity requires maximizing social preferences, as expressed by the equation W = 4gn. where W is social preference, g is quantity, and n is diversity.

Assuming the economy has 200 input units, we can find the total cost (TC) by multiplying the input unit by 2, the definite marginal cost (MC).

TC = MC * input = 2 * 200 = 400.

Total cost (TC) is made up of fixed cost (FC) plus variable cost (VC).

TC = FC + VC.

Fixed costs are given as 10, so variable costs (VC) can be calculated as:

VC = TC - FC = 400 - 10 = 390.

Finding the optimal combination of yield and diversity requires maximizing the social preference function given available inputs and given cost constraints for output variety. The formula for the social preference function is W = 4gn.

We can rewrite this equation in terms of the input (g).

g = W/(4n).

Substituting variable cost (VC) and constant marginal cost (MC) into the equation, we get:

[tex]g=(VC/MC)/(4n)=390/(2*4n)=97.5/n.[/tex]

To maximize the social preference, we need to find the value of n that makes the set g as large as possible. Since the magnitude n cannot exceed 100 (because the quantity g cannot exceed 200), 100 is the maximum value of n that satisfies the equation. Substituting n = 100 into the equation g = 97.5 / n gives:

g = 97.5/100 = 0.975.

Learn more about output variety here:
https://brainly.com/question/29057786

#SPJ11

The maximum value M for the directional derivative at the point (1,-1,4) is 39.Therefore, the maximum value M for the directional derivative at the point (1,-1,4) is 15.

To find the maximum value M for the directional derivative at the point (1,-1,4) of the function f(x, y, z) = 5x^3 – y^2 + z^2, we need to determine the direction that maximizes the directional derivative. The directional derivative is given by the dot product of the gradient vector (∇f) and the unit vector in the desired direction.

First, let's find the gradient vector (∇f) of the function. The gradient vector is a vector that contains the partial derivatives of the function with respect to each variable.

∇f = (∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y, ∂f/∂z)

Taking the partial derivatives, we have:

∂f/∂x = 15x^2

∂f/∂y = -2y

∂f/∂z = 2z

Now, evaluate the gradient vector (∇f) at the point (1,-1,4):

∇f(1,-1,4) = (15(1)^2, -2(-1), 2(4)) = (15, 2, 8)

The directional derivative is given by the dot product of the gradient vector (∇f) and the unit vector (a, b, c):

D = ∇f · (a, b, c) = 15a + 2b + 8c

To maximize D, we need to maximize 15a + 2b + 8c. Since we are not given any constraints or restrictions, we can choose any values for a, b, and c. To simplify the calculations, we can choose a = 1, b = 0, and c = 0.

Plugging these values into the equation, we have:

D = 15(1) + 2(0) + 8(0) = 15

It's important to mention that the question does not specify the direction or any constraints, so the maximum value M is subjective and can change depending on the chosen direction vector.

Learn more about Derivate: brainly.in/question/1044252

#SPJ11

The given series, 22 + 100/(3^(2n+1)) * (5^(-1)), is absolutely convergent.

To determine the convergence of the series, we need to examine the behavior of its terms as n approaches infinity. Let's break down the series into its two terms. The first term, 22, is a constant and does not depend on n. The second term involves a fraction with a power of 3 and 5. As n increases, the numerator, 100, remains constant. However, the denominator, ([tex]3^{2n+1}[/tex]) * ([tex]5^{-1}[/tex]), increases significantly.

Since the exponent of 3 in the denominator is an odd number, as n increases, the denominator will become larger and larger, causing the value of each term to approach zero. Additionally, the term ([tex]5^{-1}[/tex]) in the denominator is a constant. As a result, the second term of the series approaches zero as n goes to infinity.

Since both terms of the series tend to finite values as n approaches infinity, we can conclude that the series is absolutely convergent. This means that the sum of the series will converge to a finite value, and changing the order of the terms will not affect the sum.

Learn more about absolutely convergent here:

https://brainly.com/question/30480114

#SPJ11

The given ordinary differential equation (ODE) is a second-order linear nonhomogeneous ODE with constant coefficients. By applying the method of undetermined coefficients and solving the resulting homogeneous and particular solutions.

The ODE is of the form[tex]y″ + 2y′ + 17y[/tex] = [tex]60[/tex][tex]e^[/tex][tex]^[/tex][tex](-4x)sin(5x)[/tex]. To classify the ODE, we examine the coefficients of the highest derivatives. In this case, the coefficients are constant, indicating a linear ODE. The presence of the nonhomogeneous term [tex]60e^(-4x)sin(5x)[/tex] makes it nonhomogeneous.

Since the term involves a product of exponential and trigonometric functions, we guess a particular solution of the form [tex]yp =[/tex] [tex]Ae(-4x)sin(5x) + Be(-4x)cos(5x)[/tex], where A and B are constants to be determined.

Next, we find the derivatives of yp and substitute them into the original ODE to obtain a particular solution. By comparing the coefficients of each term on both sides, Solve for the constants A and B.

Now, we focus on the homogeneous part of the ODE, [tex]y″ + 2y′ + 17y[/tex] [tex]=0[/tex]. The characteristic equation is obtained by assuming a solution of the form [tex]yh = e(rt)[/tex], where r is a constant. By substituting yh into the homogeneous ODE, we get a quadratic equation for r.

Finally, the general solution to the ODE is the sum of the homogeneous and particular solutions.

Learn more about homogeneous here:
https://brainly.com/question/14926412

#SPJ11

The first five nonzero terms of the Taylor series for[tex]f(x) = \frac{7 \cdot \arctan(x)}{\frac{\pi}{24}}[/tex] about the point a = 1 are [tex]7 + \frac{84}{\pi}(x - 1) - \frac{84}{\pi}(x - 1)^2 + 0 + 0[/tex]

The first five nonzero terms of the Taylor series generated by the function [tex]f(x) = \frac{7 \cdot \arctan(x)}{\frac{\pi}{24}}[/tex] about the point a = 1 can be found using the definition of the Taylor series.

The general form of the Taylor series expansion is given by:

[tex]f(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x - a) + (f''(a)(x - a)^2)/2! + (f'''(a)(x - a)^3)/3! + (f''''(a)(x - a)^4)/4! + ...[/tex]

To find the first five nonzero terms, we need to evaluate the function f(x) and its derivatives up to the fourth derivative at the point a = 1.

First, let's find the function and its derivatives:

[tex]f(x) = \frac{7 \cdot \arctan(x)}{\frac{\pi}{24}}[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = \frac{7}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + x^2)}[/tex]

[tex]f''(x) = \frac{-7 \cdot (2x)}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + x^2)^2}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x) = \frac{-7 \cdot (2 \cdot (1 + x^2) - 4x^2)}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + x^2)^3}[/tex]

[tex]f''''(x) = \frac{-7 \cdot (8x - 12x^3)}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + x^2)^4}[/tex]

Now, let's substitute the value of a = 1 into these expressions and simplify:

[tex]f(1) = \frac{7 \cdot \arctan(1)}{\frac{\pi}{24}} = 7[/tex]

[tex]f'(1) = \frac{7}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + 1^2)} = \frac{84}{\pi}[/tex]

[tex]f''(1) = \frac{-7 \cdot (2 \cdot 1)}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + 1^2)^2} = \frac{-84}{\pi}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(1) = \frac{-7 \cdot (2 \cdot (1 + 1^2) - 4 \cdot 1^2)}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + 1^2)^3} = 0[/tex]

[tex]f''''(1) = \frac{-7 \cdot (8 \cdot 1 - 12 \cdot 1^3)}{\frac{\pi}{24} \cdot (1 + 1^2)^4} = 0[/tex]

Now we can write the first five nonzero terms of the Taylor series:

[tex]f(x) = 7 + \frac{84}{\pi}(x - 1) - \frac{84}{\pi}(x - 1)^2 + \dots[/tex]

These terms provide an approximation of the function f(x) near the point a = 1, with increasing accuracy as more terms are added to the series.

Learn more about Taylor series here:

https://brainly.com/question/31140778

#SPJ11

(a) the solution to the initial value problem is: y(t) = cos(20t) + sin(20t) + cos(19t)

(b) The solution in the requested format is: y(t) = لها - Aco(1) co() COS

= cos(20t) - cos(π/2 - 20t) cos(19t)

To solve the initial value problem, we can use the method of undetermined coefficients. Let's proceed step by step:

(a) Solve the initial value problem:

The homogeneous equation associated with the given differential equation is:

y'' + 400y = 0

The characteristic equation for this homogeneous equation is:

r^2 + 400 = 0

Solving this quadratic equation, we find two complex conjugate roots:

r1 = -20i

r2 = 20i

The general solution for the homogeneous equation is:

y_h(t) = C1 cos(20t) + C2 sin(20t)

Now, let's find a particular solution for the non-homogeneous equation:

We assume a particular solution of the form:

y_p(t) = A cos(19t) + B sin(19t)

Differentiating twice:

y_p''(t) = -361A cos(19t) - 361B sin(19t)

Substituting into the original equation:

-361A cos(19t) - 361B sin(19t) + 400(A cos(19t) + B sin(19t)) = 39 cos(19t)

Simplifying:

(400A - 361A) cos(19t) + (400B - 361B) sin(19t) = 39 cos(19t)

Comparing coefficients:

400A - 361A = 39

400B - 361B = 0

Solving these equations, we find:

A = 39/39 = 1

B = 0/39 = 0

Therefore, the particular solution is:

y_p(t) = cos(19t)

The general solution for the non-homogeneous equation is:

y(t) = y_h(t) + y_p(t)

= C1 cos(20t) + C2 sin(20t) + cos(19t)

Applying the initial conditions:

y(0) = C1 cos(0) + C2 sin(0) + cos(0) = C1 + 1 = 2

y'(0) = -20C1 sin(0) + 20C2 cos(0) - 19 sin(0) = -19

From the first condition, we have:

C1 = 2 - 1 = 1

From the second condition, we have:

-20C1 + 20C2 - 19 = 0

-20(1) + 20C2 - 19 = 0

20C2 = 19 - (-20)

20C2 = 39

C2 = 39/20

Therefore, the solution to the initial value problem is:

y(t) = cos(20t) + sin(20t) + cos(19t)

(b) Rewrite the initial value problem solution in the format لها - Aco (1) co() COS:

The given format لها - Aco (1) co() COS suggests representing the solution using the sum-to-product formula for cosine.

Using the identity cos(A)cos(B) = 1/2[cos(A + B) + cos(A - B)], we can rewrite the solution as:

y(t) = cos(20t) + sin(20t) + cos(19t)

= cos(20t) + cos(π/2 - 20t) + cos(19t)

Comparing with the given format, we have:

لها = cos(20t)

Aco(1) = cos(π/2 - 20t)

co() = cos(19t)

Therefore, the solution in the requested format is:

y(t) = لها - Aco(1) co() COS

= cos(20t) - cos(π/2 - 20t) cos(19t)

To know more about initial value problem, visit the link : https://brainly.com/question/31041139

#SPJ11

The value of line BE is 40

polygon is any closed curve consisting of a set of line segments (sides) connected such that no two segments cross.

A regular polygon is a polygon with equal sides and equal length.

The encircled polygon will have equal sides.

Therefore;

4x = 6x -20

4x -6x = -20

-2x = -20

divide both sides by -2

x = -20/-2

x = 10

Since BE = 6x -20

= 6( 10) -20

= 60-20

= 40

therefore the value of BE is 40

learn more about polygon from

https://brainly.com/question/1592456

#SPJ1

Question

The diagram for the illustration is attached above.

The mold will cover area of 1000 square millimeters after 11.09 units of time.

We are given that the area of mold A is given by the function A(d) = 100 times e to the power of 0.25d. Thus, we can obtain the value of d when the mold covers 1000 square millimeters by equating the function to 1000 and solving for d. 100 times e to the power of 0.25d = 1000

Let's divide each side by 100:

e to the power of 0.25d = 10

To isolate e to the power of 0.25d, we can take the natural logarithm of each side:

ln(e to the power of 0.25d) = ln(10)

By the logarithmic identity ln(e^x) = x, we can simplify the left side to:

0.25d = ln(10)

Finally, to solve for d, we can divide each side by 0.25:

d = (1/0.25) ln(10) ≈ 11.09

Thus, the mold will cover an area of 1000 square millimeters after approximately 11.09 units of time (which is not specified in the question). This reasoning assumes that the rate of growth of the mold is proportional to its current size, and that there are no limiting factors that would prevent the mold from growing indefinitely.

Learn more about Area:

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

We are asked to evaluate f''(6), f''(3), and f''(2) for the function f(x) = 4x + 4.

To find the second derivative of the function f(x), we need to differentiate it twice. The first derivative of f(x) is f'(x) = 4, as the derivative of 4x is 4 and the derivative of a constant is zero. Since f'(x) is a constant, the second derivative f''(x) is zero.

Now, let's evaluate f''(6), f''(3), and f''(2) using the second derivative f''(x) = 0:

f''(6) = 0: The second derivative of f(x) is zero, so the value of f''(6) is zero.

f''(3) = 0: Similarly, the value of f''(3) is also zero.

f''(2) = 0: Once again, since the second derivative is zero, the value of f''(2) is zero.

In conclusion, for the function f(x) = 4x + 4, the second derivative f''(x) is identically zero, which means that f''(6), f''(3), and f''(2) all have a value of zero.

Learn more about derivative  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29020856

#SPJ11

The equation tan(t) = -1 is solved for values of t between 0 and 27. The exact solutions are provided, separated by commas.

To solve the equation tan(t) = -1, we need to find the values of t between 0 and 27 where the tangent function equals -1.

The tangent function is negative in the second and fourth quadrants of the unit circle. In the second quadrant, the tangent function is positive, so we can disregard it. However, in the fourth quadrant, the tangent function is negative, which aligns with our given equation.

The tangent function has a period of π, so we can find the solutions by looking at the values of t in the fourth quadrant that satisfy the equation. The exact values of t can be found by using the inverse tangent function, also known as arctan or tan^(-1).

Using arctan(-1), we can determine that the principal solution in the fourth quadrant is t = 3π/4. Adding the period π repeatedly, we get t = 7π/4, 11π/4, 15π/4, and 19π/4, which all fall within the given range of 0 to 27.

Therefore, the exact solutions to the equation tan(t) = -1 for 0 < t < 27 are t = 3π/4, 7π/4, 11π/4, 15π/4, and 19π/4, separated by commas.

Learn more about quadrant here:

https://brainly.com/question/26426112

#SPJ11

The function f(x) = x^4 - 6x^2 - 16 has points of inflection at x = -1 and x = 1, At x = -1, the concavity changes from concave down to concave up, At x = 1, the concavity changes from concave up to concave down.

To find the points of inflection and determine the concavity of the function f(x) = x^4 - 6x^2 - 16, we need to calculate the second derivative and analyze its sign changes.

First, let's find the first derivative of f(x):

f'(x) = 4x^3 - 12x

Now, let's find the second derivative by differentiating f'(x):

f''(x) = 12x^2 - 12

To find the points of inflection, we need to determine where the concavity changes. This occurs when the second derivative changes sign. So, we set f''(x) = 0 and solve for x:

12x^2 - 12 = 0

Dividing both sides by 12, we get:

x^2 - 1 = 0

Factoring the equation, we have:

(x - 1)(x + 1) = 0

So, the solutions are x = 1 and x = -1.

Now, let's analyze the concavity by considering the sign of f''(x) in different intervals.

For x < -1, we can choose x = -2 as a test value:

f''(-2) = 12(-2)^2 - 12 = 48 - 12 = 36 > 0

For -1 < x < 1, we can choose x = 0 as a test value:

f''(0) = 12(0)^2 - 12 = -12 < 0

For x > 1, we can choose x = 2 as a test value:

f''(2) = 12(2)^2 - 12 = 48 - 12 = 36 > 0

From the sign changes, we can conclude that the function changes concavity at x = -1 and x = 1. Therefore, these are the points of inflection.

At x = -1, the concavity changes from concave down to concave up.

At x = 1, the concavity changes from concave up to concave down.

In summary:

- The function f(x) = x^4 - 6x^2 - 16 has points of inflection at x = -1 and x = 1.

- At x = -1, the concavity changes from concave down to concave up.

- At x = 1, the concavity changes from concave up to concave down.

To know more about points of inflection refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30767426#

#SPJ11

The height of the water balloon at 2 seconds is -36.3 feet.

To find an equation representing the height of the water balloon at time T seconds, we can use the equation of motion for an object in free fall:

h = h₀ + v₀t + (1/2)gt²

Where:

h is the height of the object at time T

h₀ is the initial height (12 feet in this case)

v₀ is the initial velocity (which we need to determine)

t is the time elapsed (T seconds in this case)

g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 32.2 ft/s²)

Since the water balloon reaches a maximum height of 37 feet after 1.25 seconds, we can use this information to find the initial velocity. At the maximum height, the vertical velocity becomes zero (the balloon momentarily stops before falling back down). So, we can set v = 0 and t = 1.25 seconds in the equation to find v₀:

0 = v₀ + gt

0 = v₀ + (32.2 ft/s²)(1.25 s)

0 = v₀ + 40.25 ft/s

Solving for v₀:

v₀ = -40.25 ft/s

Now we have the initial velocity. We can substitute the values into the equation:

h = 12 + (-40.25)T + (1/2)(32.2)(T²)

To find the height of the balloon at 2 seconds (T = 2), we can plug in T = 2 into the equation:

h = 12 + (-40.25)(2) + (1/2)(32.2)(2²)

h = 12 - 80.5 + (1/2)(32.2)(4)

h = 12 - 80.5 + 16.1

h = -52.4 + 16.1

h = -36.3

Therefore, the height of the water balloon at 2 seconds is -36.3 feet.

for such more question on height

https://brainly.com/question/23377525

#SPJ8

The degree 3 Taylor polynomial T3(x) for the function f(x) = [tex](-7x + 270)^{(5/4)[/tex] at a = 2 is:

T3(x) = 32 - 7(x - 2) - (49/512[tex])(x - 2)^2[/tex] + (-147/4194304)[tex](x - 2)^3[/tex]

To find the degree 3 Taylor polynomial, we need to calculate the polynomial approximation of the function up to the third degree centered at the point a = 2. We can find the Taylor polynomial by evaluating the function and its derivatives at a = 2.

First, let's find the derivatives of the function f(x) = [tex](-7x + 270)^{(5/4)[/tex]:

f'(x) = [tex](-7/4)(-7x + 270)^{(1/4)[/tex]

f''(x) = [tex](-7/4)(1/4)(-7x + 270)^{(-3/4)}(-7)[/tex]

f'''(x) = [tex](-7/4)(1/4)(-3/4)(-7x + 270)^{(-7/4)}(-7)[/tex]

Now, let's evaluate these derivatives at a = 2:

f(2) = [tex](-7(2) + 270)^{(5/4)[/tex]

     = [tex](256)^{(5/4)[/tex]

     = 32

f'(2) = [tex](-7/4)(-7(2) + 270)^{(1/4)[/tex]

      = [tex](-7/4)(256)^{(1/4)[/tex]

      = [tex](-7/4)(4)[/tex]

      = -7

f''(2) = [tex](-7/4)(1/4)(-7(2) + 270)^{(-3/4)}(-7)[/tex]

       = [tex](-7/4)(1/4)(256)^{(-3/4)}(-7)[/tex]

       = (7/16)(1/256)(-7)

       = -49/512

f'''(2) = [tex](-7/4)(1/4)(-3/4)(-7(2) + 270)^{(-7/4)}(-7)[/tex]

       = [tex](-7/4)(1/4)(-3/4)(256)^{(-7/4)}(-7)[/tex]

       = (21/256)(1/16384)(-7)

       = -147/4194304

Now, let's write the degree 3 Taylor polynomial T3(x) using the above derivatives:

T3(x) = f(2) + f'(2)(x - 2) + f''(2)[tex](x - 2)^2[/tex]/2! + f'''(2)[tex](x - 2)^3[/tex]/3!

Substituting the values we calculated:

T3(x) = 32 - 7(x - 2) - (49/512)[tex](x - 2)^2[/tex] + (-147/4194304)[tex](x - 2)^3[/tex]

So, the degree 3 Taylor polynomial T3(x) for the function f(x) = [tex](-7x + 270)^{(5/4)[/tex] at a = 2 is:

T3(x) = 32 - 7(x - 2) - (49/512)[tex](x - 2)^2[/tex] + (-147/4194304)[tex](x - 2)^3[/tex]

Learn more about Taylor Polynomial at

brainly.com/question/30481013

#SPJ4

It is impossible to construct an equilateral triangle with three vertices with integer coordinates.

Suppose ABC is an equilateral triangle with integer coordinates.

Then its area by the formula [tex]\frac{1}{2} (x_{1} (y_{2} -y_{3})+x_{2}(y_{3} -y_{1})+x_{3} (y_{1} -y_{2}))[/tex] is an integer.

Let a be the length of a side. Then [tex]a^{2}[/tex] is a positive integer. The area of the equilateral triangle is [tex]\sqrt{\frac{3}{4} } a^{2}[/tex] which is irrational.

Hence we get a contradiction.

Therefore an equilateral triangle cannot have all its vertices integer coordinates.

For more information on equilateral triangle

https://brainly.com/question/30285619

https://brainly.com/question/30095629

It is impossible to construct an equilateral triangle with three vertices with integer coordinates because the distance between any two points with integer coordinates is also an integer. In an equilateral triangle, all three sides must have equal length. However, if the distance between two points with integer coordinates is an integer, then the distance between the third point and either of the first two points will not be an integer in most cases. This means that it is not possible to find three points with integer coordinates that are equidistant from each other.

The distance between two points with integer coordinates can be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. If we consider two points with coordinates (x1, y1) and (x2, y2), the distance between them is √((x2-x1)²+(y2-y1)²). If the distance between two points is an integer, it means that the difference between the x-coordinates and the y-coordinates is also an integer. In an equilateral triangle, the distance between any two points must be the same. However, it is impossible to find three points with integer coordinates that are equidistant from each other.

In conclusion, it is not possible to construct an equilateral triangle with three vertices with integer coordinates because the distance between any two points with integer coordinates is also an integer. In an equilateral triangle, all three sides must have equal length. However, if the distance between two points with integer coordinates is an integer, then the distance between the third point and either of the first two points will not be an integer in most cases. This means that it is not possible to find three points with integer coordinates that are equidistant from each other.

To know more about equilateral triangle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17824549

#SPJ11

Bar graphs can be used to display both discrete and continuous data, making them a versatile tool for visualizing a wide range of information.

The graphic presentation of data that displays its categories as rectangles of equal width with their height proportional to the frequency or percentage of the category is called a bar graph.

In a bar graph, the bars represent the categories being compared and are arranged along the horizontal axis, with the height of each bar representing the frequency or percentage of the category being displayed.

Bar graphs are a useful tool for presenting numerical data in a visually appealing way, making it easy for viewers to compare different categories and draw conclusions from the data.

To learn more about : Bar graphs

https://brainly.com/question/30243333

#SPJ8

The researcher should have chosen option D: Switch the order of study methods for the participants before the test.

People frequently choose familiar options over novel ones, even when the latter may be superior, a phenomenon known as the familiarity bias.

To avoid the problem of students getting through the exam faster the second time due to familiarity, the researcher should have chosen option D: Switch the order of study methods for the participants before the test.

By switching the order of study methods, the researcher can control for the potential bias caused by familiarity or memory effects. This ensures that the effect observed is truly due to the difference in study methods rather than the order in which they were encountered.

If the same group of students always starts with the lecture summaries and then moves on to watching and listening to lecture summaries, they may perform better on the second test simply because they are more familiar with the material, test format, or timing. Switching the order of study methods helps eliminate this potential bias and provides a fair comparison between the two methods.

Options A, B, and C are not relevant to addressing the issue of familiarity bias in this scenario.

Learn more about familiarity bias on:

https://brainly.com/question/17157189

#SPJ4

(a) Since r must be positive, the container radius that maximizes profit per container is 0.2333 metres.

(b) The highest profit per container is estimated to be $0.65.

To determine the radius of the container that maximizes the profit per container,

First determine the volume of oil that can be shipped in each container. Since the height of each container is equal to the diameter,

We know that the height is twice the radius.

So, the volume of the cylinder is given by,

⇒ V = πr²(2r)

       = 2πr³

Now determine the cost of shipping the oil, which is =  $10/m³.

Since the volume of oil shipped is 2πr³,

The cost of shipping the oil is,

⇒ C = 10(2πr³)

       = 20πr³

Now determine the revenue from selling the steel,

Since the steel is sold for $7/m²,

The revenue from selling the steel is,

⇒ R = 7(πr²)

       = 7πr²

So, the profit per container is,

⇒ P = R - C

       = 7πr² - 20πr³

To maximize the profit per container,

we can take the derivative of P with respect to r and set it equal to zero,

⇒ dP/dr = 14πr - 60πr²

             = 0

Solving for r, we get,

⇒ r = 0 or r = 14/60

                   = 0.2333

Since r must be positive, the radius of the container that maximizes the profit per container is  0.2333 meters.

Now for part b) to determine the maximum profit per container. Substituting r = 0.2333 into our expression for P, we get,

⇒ P = 7π(0.2333)² - 20π(0.2333)³

      = $0.6512

So, the maximum profit per container is approximately $0.65.

To learn more about volume of container visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23423861

#SPJ4

Using the cross product the area of a parallelogram is √(2(c² + 4c + 8)).

To find the area of the parallelogram with vertices A = (1, 1, 2), B = (0, 2, 3), C = (2, c, 1), and D = (-1, c + 3, 4), we can use the cross product.

Let's find the vectors corresponding to the sides of the parallelogram:

Vector AB = B - A = (0, 2, 3) - (1, 1, 2) = (-1, 1, 1)

Vector AD = D - A = (-1, c + 3, 4) - (1, 1, 2) = (-2, c + 2, 2)

Now, calculate the cross-product of these vectors:

Cross product: AB x AD = (AB)y * (AD)z - (AB)z * (AD)y, (AB)z * (AD)x - (AB)x * (AD)z, (AB)x * (AD)y - (AB)y * (AD)x

= (-1)(c + 2) - (1)(2), (1)(2) - (-1)(2), (-1)(c + 2) - (1)(-2)

= -c - 2 - 2, 2 - 2, -c - 2 + 2

= -c - 4, 0, -c

The magnitude of the cross-product gives us the area of the parallelogram:

Area = |AB x AD| = √((-c - 4)² + 0² + (-c)²)

= √(c² + 8c + 16 + c²)

= √(2c² + 8c + 16)

= √(2(c² + 4c + 8))

Therefore, the area of the parallelogram is √(2(c² + 4c + 8)).

To know more about parallelogram, refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/28854514#

#SPJ11

To find the parametric equations for the tangent line to the curve of intersection of the given paraboloid and ellipsoid at the point (-1, 1, 2), we need to determine the direction vector of the tangent line and use it to construct the parametric equations.

To find the direction vector of the tangent line, we first find the gradients of the paraboloid and ellipsoid at the given point (-1, 1, 2). The gradient vector of a surface represents the direction of maximum change at a given point on the surface. For the paraboloid z = x^2 + y^2, the gradient vector is (∂z/∂x, ∂z/∂y) = (2x, 2y). Evaluating this gradient at the point (-1, 1, 2), we get the direction vector of the tangent line for the paraboloid component as (-2, 2). For the ellipsoid 6x^2 + 5y^2 + 6z^2 = 35, the gradient vector is (∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y, ∂f/∂z) = (12x, 10y, 12z). Evaluating this gradient at the point (-1, 1, 2), we get the direction vector of the tangent line for the ellipsoid component as (-12, 10, 24). Since the tangent line to the curve of intersection must be tangent to both the paraboloid and the ellipsoid, we can combine the direction vectors obtained from each component. The direction vector for the tangent line is the cross product of the two direction vectors: (-2, 2) × (-12, 10, 24) = (-68, -64, -40). Finally, using the point (-1, 1, 2) as the initial point, we can construct the parametric equations of the tangent line as:

x = -1 - 68t

y = 1 - 64t

z = 2 - 40t

where t is a parameter representing the distance along the tangent line.

Learn more about tangent line here:

https://brainly.com/question/23416900

#SPJ11

We are given a differential equation involving the Laplace transform of the current, and we need to solve for the current using Laplace transforms. The initial conditions are also provided.

To solve the differential equation using Laplace transforms, we first take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation. Applying the Laplace transform to the given equation, we get: sI(s) + 1000s^2I(s) - 250000I(0) = 0. Substituting the initial condition I(0) = 0, we have: sI(s) + 1000s^2I(s) = 0. Next, we solve for I(s) by factoring out I(s) and simplifying the equation: I(s)(s + 1000s^2) = 0. From this equation, we can see that either I(s) = 0 or s + 1000s^2 = 0. The first case represents the trivial solution where the current is zero. To find the non-trivial solution, we solve the quadratic equation s + 1000s^2 = 0 and find the values of s.

To know more about Laplace transforms here: brainly.com/question/30759963

#SPJ11

The solutions to the equation are x = -10√5 and x = 10√5 = 22.3607. Option d. 0,10 correctly represents the two solutions, where x = 0 and x = 10.

To find the solutions of the equation[tex]2x^2[/tex] – 1000 = 0, we can start by setting the equation equal to zero and then solving for x. The equation becomes:

[tex]2x^2[/tex] – 1000 = 0

Adding 1000 to both sides, we get:

[tex]2x^2[/tex] = 1000

Dividing both sides by 2, we have:

X^2 = 500

Taking the square root of both sides, we get:

X = ±√500

Simplifying the square root, we have:

X = ±√(100 * 5)

X = ±10√5

Therefore, the solutions to the equation are x = -10√5 and x = 10√5 == 22.3607.

Learn more about square root here:

https://brainly.com/question/29775049

#SPJ11

The area of the surface generated by revolving the curve y = √(4 - x^2) over the interval -1 to 1 is π units squared.

To find the area, we can use the formula for the surface area of revolution. Given a curve y = f(x) over an interval [a, b], the surface area generated by revolving the curve around the x-axis is given by the integral:

A = 2π ∫[a,b] f(x) √(1 + (f'(x))^2) dx

In this case, the curve is y = √(4 - x^2) and the interval is -1 to 1. To calculate the surface area, we need to find the derivative of the curve, which is f'(x) = -x/√(4 - x^2). Substituting these values into the formula, we have:

A = 2π ∫[-1,1] √(4 - x^2) √(1 + (-x/√(4 - x^2))^2) dx

Simplifying the expression inside the integral, we get:

A = 2π ∫[-1,1] √(4 - x^2) √(1 + x^2/(4 - x^2)) dx

Integrating this expression will give us the surface area of the revolution, which turns out to be π units squared.

Learn more about surface area of revolution

https://brainly.com/question/32268747

#SPJ11

The series ∑ (7n³ - n - 4) / (3n² + n + 9) does not converge or diverge based on the root test.

To apply the root test, we consider the limit as n approaches infinity of the absolute value of the nth term raised to the power of 1/n.

Let's denote the nth term of the series as a_n:

a_n = (7n³- n - 4) / (3n² + n + 9)

Taking the absolute value and raising it to the power of 1/n, we have:

|a_n|^(1/n) = |(7n³ - n - 4) / (3n² + n + 9)|^(1/n)

Taking the limit as n approaches infinity, we have:

lim (n→∞) |a_n|^(1/n) = lim (n→∞) |(7n³ - n - 4) / (3n² + n + 9)|^(1/n)

Applying the limit, we find that the value is equal to 1.

Since the limit is equal to 1, the root test is inconclusive. The test neither confirms convergence nor divergence of the series. Therefore, we cannot determine the convergence or divergence of the series using the root test alone.

To know more about converge, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/16401483#

#SPJ11

If g of is injective, then f is injective: False and If g of is surjective, then g is injective: False of the given propositions.

The statement "If g of is injective, then f is injective" is false.

There's a counterexample that can be provided to demonstrate this.

Suppose f: R -› R and g: R -› R such that f(x) = [tex]x^2[/tex] and g(x) = x.

Now let's consider the composition g o f which gives us (g o f)(x) = g(f(x)) = [tex]g(x^2) = x^2[/tex].

In this case, g o f is injective, but f isn't injective since, for example, f(2) = 4 = f(-2).

The statement "If g of is surjective, then g is injective" is also false.

Again, there's a counterexample that can be used to demonstrate this.

Let f: R -› R be defined by f(x) = [tex]x^2[/tex] and g: R -› R be defined by g(x) = [tex]x^3[/tex].

In this case, we can see that g is surjective since any y in R can be written as y = g(x) for some x in R (just take x = [tex]y^{(1/3)}[/tex]).

However, g isn't injective since, for example, g(2) = [tex]2^3[/tex] = 8 = g(-2).Hence, both statements are false.

To learn more about proposition click here https://brainly.com/question/30895311

#SPJ11

The distance s(t) between the bicycle and balloon is -6.9.

A balloon is rising vertically above a level, straight road at a constant rate of 0.1 m/s.

Just when the balloon is 23 m above the ground, a bicycle moving at a constant rate of 7 m/s passes under it.

Distance between the balloon and bicycle is s(t). It is required to find how fast is the distance s(t) between the bicycle and balloon increasing 3 s later.

Let, Distance covered by the bicycle after 3 s = x

Distance covered by the balloon after 3 s = y

We have, y = vt where, v = 0.1 m/s (speed of the balloon)t = 3 s (time)So, y = 0.1 × 3 = 0.3 m

And, x = 7 × 3 = 21 m

Now, Distance between bicycle and balloon = s(t) = 23 - 0 = 23 m

After 3 s, Distance between bicycle and balloon = s(t + 3)

Let,

Speed of the balloon = v1 and Speed of the bicycle = v2So, v1 = 0.1 m/s and v2 = 7 m/s

We have,

s(t + 3) = √[(23 + 0.1t + 3 - 7t)² + (0.3 - 21)^2]  = √[(23 - 6.9t)² + 452.89]

Now, ds/dt = s'(t) = (1/2) * [ (23 - 6.9t)² + 452.89 ]^(-1/2) * [2( -6.9 ) ]

So, s'(t) = ( -6.9 * √[ (23 - 6.9t)² + 452.89 ] ) / [ √[ (23 - 6.9t)² + 452.89 ] ] = -6.9 m/s

Now, s'(t + 3) = -6.9 m/s

So, the distance s(t) between the bicycle and balloon is decreasing at a rate of 6.9 m/s after 3 seconds. Thus, the answer is -6.9.

To know more about distance, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31713805#

#SPJ11