PLZ PLZ PLZ ANSWER!! I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST!!!

Which answer choice shows the numbers in order from least to greatest?

• -2/3, -1/2, 7/12, 0.82
• -1/2 , -2/3, 7/12, -0.45, 0.82
• -0.45, -1/2, -2/3, 7/12, 0.82
• -0.45, -1/2, 7/12, -2/3, 0.82

lessen it data

and it will become a bigger eqaution

Answer:

open down and have a maximum

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the quiz got it right

Answer:

y2-y1

x2-x1

should be correct

Step-by-step explanation:

prove me wrong

Answer:

a. y = -2x + 7

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the slope by plugging the points into the slope formula, [tex]\frac{-7+5}{7-6}[/tex], which equals -2. Then use the slope and the point (7,-7) to make an equation in slope-point form. y+7=-2(x-7), finally solve for y to get y=-2x+7.

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

A(t) = amount in t years

P = Principal (original investment)

r = annual interest rate (in decimal form)

n = number of times that interest is compounded each year

A(t) = P(1 + r/n)nt

Substitute in the given values: 2000 = P(1 + 0.04/12)12(10)

2000 = P(1.490832682)

P = $1341.53

Answer:

77 F

Step-by-step explanation:

F = (1.8)*25 + 32

  = 45+32

  = 77

Hope this helps!

Answer:

77 degrees Fahrenheit

Step-by-step explanation:

plug 25 into 'C' in the formula

F = 1.8(25) + 32

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the meaning of the "Line of Best Fit" refers to a line through a scatter plot of data points that best expresses the relationship between those points. A straight line will result from a simple linear regression analysis of two or more independent variables.

Here is the rule for the "Line of Best Fit"

A line of best fit can only be drawn if there is strong positive or negative correlation. The line of best fit does not have to go through the origin. The line of best fit shows the trend, but it is only approximate and any readings taken from it will be estimations.

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

The line starts where the points starts and the line ends where the points end .

Answer:

90 stamps from Canada, 108 stamps from the United States, and 135 stamps from the Rest of the World

Step-by-step explanation:

Since this is a problem of proportion we can use the Rule of three to solve this. We do this by multiplying the diagonal available values and dividing by the third value in order to get the missing variable, which in this case would be the number of stamps in the other country. Like so...

1.5  <=====>  135 stamps

1.2  <=====>  x  stamps (United States)

(1.2 * 135) / 1.5 = 108 stamps (United States)

1.5  <=====>  135 stamps

1  <=====>  x  stamps (Canada)

(1 * 135) / 1.5 = 90 stamps (Canada)

Finally, we can see that Katie had 90 stamps from Canada, 108 stamps from the United States, and 135 stamps from the Rest of the World. All creating a ratio or 1:1.2:1.5

Answer:

(6, 8)

General Formulas and Concepts:

Pre-Algebra

Order of Operations: BPEMDAS

Algebra I

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define Systems

1/2y = 4

x - 1/2y = 2

Step 2: Solve for y

Step 3: Solve for x

Answer: (6,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

1/2y = 4          

x - 1/2y = 2    

First  solve for y in the first equation.

1/2y = 4      Divide both sides by 1/2

y  =  8  

NOw substitute the value of y into the second equation and solve for x.

x

x - 1/2(8) = 2

x - 4 = 2

  +4     +4

x = 6    

THis makes the solution  (6,8)

Answer:

51.3°

Step-by-step explanation:

tan y = 10/8 = 1.25

y = 51.3°

Answer:

C) The amount of money in his lunch account

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes they both will because in four they both read more then half the book and one more hours should let them finshed the book

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Zack is able to, but Pam cannot.

Step-by-step explanation:

Number of pages Pam read in 5 hours = 5 x 42 = 210 pages

Number of pages Zack read in 5 hours = 5 x 45 = 225 pages

Zack's pages is greater than 215 while Pam isn't able to read as much.

Answer:

Given,

P = ₹5,000

R = 5%

T = 6 months

= 1/2 years

S.I = P×R×T/100

= 5,000 × 5 / 2×100

= 250 / 2

= ₹125

Step-by-step explanation:

The simple interest of principal of $ 6000 at an interest rate of 5% for a period of 6 months is $ 150

What is Simple Interest?

Simple interest is a method of calculating interest that ignores the impact of compounding. While interest frequently compounds throughout the course of a loan's set periods, simple interest does not. Simple interest is calculated by multiplying the principal amount by the interest rate, times the number of periods.

Simple Interest = ( Principal Amount x Rate x Time Period ) / 100

Given data ,

Let the total amount be Principal P = $ 6000

Let the interest rate be R = 5 %

Let the number of periods be T = 6 months

So , the value of T = 1/2

Now , the simple interest is given by the formula

Simple Interest = ( Principal Amount x Rate x Time Period ) / 100

Substituting the values in the equation , we get

Simple Interest = ( 6000 x 5 x ( 1 / 2 ) ) / 100

Simple Interest = ( 60 x 5 ) / 2

Simple Interest = $ 150

Therefore , the value of simple interest is $ 150

Hence , The simple interest of principal of $ 6000 at an interest rate of 5% for a period of 6 months is $ 150

To learn more about simple interest click :

https://brainly.com/question/17282817

#SPJ2

Answer:

I'm I'm confused because

Step-by-step explanation:

which question are you talking about?

Answer:

a,b=4,-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract:

a-a+4b-10b=-4-(-16)

-6b=-4+16

-6b=12

b=-2.

Plug in:

a+4(-2)=-4

a-8=-4

a=4.

Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D

Answer:

2x + y = 17

-6x = 3y - 51

Step-by-step explanation:

You get an infinite number of solutions when two equations are really just the same. This means you can convert one into the other simply by multiplying one to get the other.

In the above answer, if you multiply the above by -3 you get:

-6x -3y = -51

which is of course -6x = 3y - 51

So that is an example of a pair that has infinite solutions.

To find all of them, you'd carefully have to compare each 2 and see if there is a multiplier to convert one into the other. You can do that!

Answer:

whats the question? I don't see one to be abel to answer you

Answer:

the value of the project is $16,096.88

The computation of the value of the project is shown below:

= (Expected amount generated per year × (1 - (1 ++ rate of returm)^-time period )) ÷ rate of return

= $36,950 ×  [1 - 1.1^-6] ÷ 0.1

= $16,0926.88

Hence, the value of the project is $16,096.88

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

Answer:

Cash flow refers to the constant movement of money, both where and how much you're spending as well as how much you're earning in return.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

420/89

Step-by-step explanation:

What we know:

Demetrius scored 28 points in 356 seconds.

To get the per second rate divide 28 by 356.

28/356 = 7/89

Here, we're looking for the per minute rate, so multiply the previous rate by 60.

(7*60)/89 = 420/89 (Since this asks for an improper fraction, I'll keep it as so.)

Answers:

The first and third options should be selected.

Explanation:

In order for a point to be a solution to a system of equations, it must make both equations true when its x and y values are substituted in. That being said, we need to test if (10,5) is a solution for the two equations.

Let's try the first equation. Substitute 10 for x and 5 for y and solve:

[tex]2x - 5y = -5\\2(10) - 5(5) = -5\\20 - 25 = -5\\-5 = -5[/tex]

-5 does equal -5, so (10,5) is a solution to the first equation.

Next, let's test the second equation. Do the same:

[tex]x + 2y = 11\\(10) + 2 (5) = 11\\10 + 10 = 11\\20 = 11[/tex]

However, 20 does not equal 11, therefore (10,5) is not a solution to the second equation.

So far, we know that (10,5) is a solution to the first equation, but not the second equation. Knowing this, it cannot  be a solution to the system because it does not make both equations true. Therefore, only the first and third options should be selected.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

12x - 4 = 56

add 4 to each side

12x = 60

divide each side by 12

x = 5

Answer:

10/(9y)

Step-by-step explanation:

multiply y by 9: 9y

then divide 10 by the result: 10/(9y)

Answer:

1) z = -6.32

2) p-value = 0.001 × 10^(-2)

3) we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court

Step-by-step explanation:

We are told that In a representative sample of 1000 adult Americans, only 400 could name at least one justice.

Thus:

Sample proportion; p^ = 400/1000 = 0.4

Sample size: n = 1000

We want to find if there is convincing evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice.

Thus, the hypothesis is defined as;

Null hypothesis:H0: p ≥ 0.5

Alternative hypothesis: Ha < 0.5

Formula for the test statistic is;

z = (p^ - p)/√(p(1 - p)/n)

Plugging in the relevant values;

z = (0.4 - 0.5)/√(0.5(1 - 0.5)/1000)

z = -6.32

From online p-value from z-score calculator attached, using z = -6.32; significance level of 0.01; one tailed hypothesis;

We have:

p-value = 0.00001 = 0.001 × 10^(-2)

The p-value is less than the significance level and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is enough evidence to support the claim that fewer than half of adult Americans can name at least one justice currently serving on the Supreme Court

Answer:

4(20+3)

Step-by-step explanation:

4(2+13) = 4(15)

4(20+30) = 4(50)

4(2+3) = 4(5)

4(20+3) = 4(23)

Therefore, 4(20+3) is the answer since it's equivalent to 4(23).

Answer:

............................................4(20+3)

Answer:

[tex]3\frac{1}{5}n[/tex] + 4

Step-by-step explanation:

First Step: Write the equation

(3n - 9) + ([tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]n + 13) =

Second Step: Combine like terms together

(3n + [tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex]n) + (-9 + 13)=

Third Step: Simplify

[tex]3\frac{1}{5}n[/tex] + 4

Hope this helped! <3

Answer/Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the line that passes through the two points would be correct if each point, when substituted into the equation, satisfy the equation.

This is what I mean:

Given the equation of the line, y = 2x - 5, and the two points (-2, -9) and (3, 1):

For the first point, substitute x = -2, and y = -9 into y = 2x - 5.

Thus:

-9 = 2(-2) - 5

-9 = -4 - 5

-9 = -9 (this is true). It means the line runs through the point (-2, -9)

For the second point, substitute x = 3, and y = 1 into y = 2x - 5

This:

1 = 2(3) - 5

1 = 6 - 5

1 = 1 (this is true). This also means the point, (3, 1) is also a point that the equation runs across.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: