QUESTION 7
The use of specialized drug courts is closely associated with the drug control policies of which perspective on justice?
O a. due process perspective.
O b. nonintervention perspective.
O c. crime control perspective.
O d. restorative justice perspective.

Common law is a theory of legal convergence based on the idea that, in the era before the rise of the nation State, the entire civilized world' was governed by one legal system: the Roman-Canonic jus commune.​

    A body of law called the Common Law is derived through court judgments, commonly referred to as case laws. The foundation of common law is the broad acceptance and long-standing custom of the populace. It is a jurisprudential system that had its inception in England. It covers those sets of legal guidelines whose applicability is determined by the principles put forth in court rulings. The common law system contains guiding concepts and ways of thinking, as well as custom, tradition, and usage. It is the physical manifestation of extensive unwritten ideas that were developed from common sense and a feeling of justice.

To learn more about common law click here:

https://brainly.com/question/13070537

#SPJ9

I would say police officers or health inspectors because they have the right to inspect any establishments with alcohol. Hope it helps :D

Famous sovereignty, additionally known as squatter sovereignty, in U.S. history, an arguable political doctrine in keeping with which the human beings of federal territories need to determine for themselves whether or not their territories might input the Union as unfastened or slave states.

Sovereignty is the defining authority inside character consciousness, social assemble or territory. Sovereignty includes hierarchy withinside the nation, in addition to outside autonomy for states. There are 3 styles of sovereign governments withinside the United States: the federal authorities, national governments, and tribal governments. A federal authority derives its sovereign energy from human beings—its vote-casting citizens. A nation's authority derives its sovereign energy from the federal authorities.

Learn more about Sovereignty here: https://brainly.com/question/7226587

#SPJ9

The state of the economy and poverty is said to lead to an increase in the rate of crime.

Crime is conduct, both through act or omission, described via statutory or not unusual law as deserving of punishment or penalty. although maximum crimes require the element of purpose, wonderful minor crimes may be dedicated based totally on strict liability even though the defendant had no specific mindset in regards to the criminal hobby.

Against the law takes location even as someone breaks the law by means of manner of an overt act, omission, or neglect that could bring about punishment. someone who has violated a law, or has breached a rule, is stated to have dedicated a crime.

Learn more about crime here: https://brainly.com/question/6203610

#SPJ9

The attending physician most likely misdiagnosed the first child's smith-lemli-opitz syndrome by informing the parents that birth defects just weren't genetic.

Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome is a developmental disability that affects multiple body systems.

This condition is distinguished by distinct facial features, a small brain size (microcephaly), intellectually disabled or learning difficulties, and behavioral difficulties.

For the given situation;

Thus, the probability of two children of heterozygous parents being affected is 0.25 times 0.25 = 0.0625, or slightly more than 6%.

To know more about the genetic disorders, here

https://brainly.com/question/12555957

#SPJ4

The key difference between the constitutional courts and the special courts is that the special courts only hear cases in a very narrow jurisdiction and the judges serve for a specific term while the constitutional court's main authority is to rule on whether laws that are challenged are in fact unconstitutional.

It refers to the highest court in the country when it comes to the interpretation, protection and enforcement of the Constitution. The constitutional courts deals exclusively with constitutional matters such as those cases that raise questions about the application or interpretation of the Constitution.

It refers to the bodies of court within the judicial branch of government that generally address only one area of law or have specifically defined powers.

In conclusion, the difference between the constitutional courts and the special courts is that the special courts only hear cases in a very narrow jurisdiction and the judges serve for a specific term while the constitutional court's main authority is to rule on whether laws that are challenged are in fact unconstitutional.

Read more about courts

brainly.com/question/26659100

#SPJ1

The key difference between constitutional courts and special courts is special courts only investigate complaints in a very limited jurisdiction, and the jury serve for a particular term, whereas the main authority of constitutional courts is to diagnose on whether challenged laws are in real sense unconstitutional, for example, whether they contradict with constitutionally formed rights and freedoms.

Special" courts are given direct, statutory jurisdiction in a single area, as opposed to constitutional courts, which have authority in multiple fields as long as they are not based on state statutes.

To learn more about special courts and constitutional courts: brainly.com/question/381471

#SPJ4

Zoning laws, which restrict certain land uses to specific areas, may be justified in addressing adverse externalities since they can limit locations of businesses that generate negative externalities.

Zoning laws typically define the areas that may be used for industrial, recreational, residential, or commercial purposes. An R-1 residential zone, for example, may permit only single-family residential properties rather than duplexes or apartment buildings. A C-1 commercial zone, on the other hand, may be zoned to allow only certain industrial or commercial uses in one territory while allowing a mix of accommodation and businesses in another.

To learn more about zoning laws: brainly.com/question/2494528

#SPJ4

We must have financial needs, be U.S. citizens or eligible noncitizens, and be enrolled in an eligible degree or certificate program at our college or career school to be eligible to receive federal aid.

Therefore, we must have financial needs, be U.S. citizens or eligible noncitizens, and be enrolled in an eligible degree or certificate program at our college or career school to be eligible to receive federal aid.

Know more about federal aid here:

https://brainly.com/question/1377918

#SPJ4

commercial e-mail to randomly generated addresses.

Larger quantities of mail that are prepared for mailing at discounted postage rates are referred to as "commercial mail." The terms "commercial mail" and "advertising mail" are used interchangeably in Business Mail 101. (called "USPS Marketing Mail" by the Postal Service). Other classes of mail are also available at commercial rates.

Compared to "single-piece" prices, commercial prices are lower. When you apply a stamp to a letter, you are applying single-piece postage, which entails paying the full amount. Even though they are sending out massive mailings, many mailers still pay single-piece postage. Why? because they don't want to undertake any further preparation work, either because they lack the time to do so or because doing so would be too expensive for their company.

To know more about commercial e-mail visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13139056

#SPJ4

The statement that is true with regard to the statute of frauds is " All contracts involving consideration of more than $500 must be in writing."

This is further explained below.

Generally, The statute of fraud (SOF) is a legal principle that stipulates that certain kinds of transactions have to be put into writing before they may be legally binding.

The Act applies to contracts involving the sale of land, agreements involving products with a value of more than $500, and contracts with a duration of at least one year.

In conclusion, In reference to the statute of frauds, the statement that "All transactions involving consideration of more than $500 must be in writing" is accurate.

Read more about   statute of frauds

https://brainly.com/question/6806950

#SPJ1

The 97th constitutional amendment is of special significance for the supreme court when considering how to best protect individual rights from action by state and local governments.

The constitution of a nation, organization, or another sort of body can be changed through a constitutional amendment. In an established constitution, amendments are frequently braided into the pertinent parts, directly changing the wording. They can also be added to the constitution as supplemental additions (codicils), affecting the structure of government without changing the wording of the original document.

The majority of constitutions stipulate that in order to become law, amendments must first undergo a more rigorous special procedure than is necessary for regular legislation. Examples of these extraordinary procedures include supermajorities in the legislature, direct voter approval in a referendum, or even a combination of two or more different special procedures.

To know more about constitutional amendment visit:- https://brainly.com/question/8643523

#SPJ4

A collateral attack is the term for an appellate court’s decision to overturn the decision of the lower court and rule in favor of the person filing the appeal.

It is also called an indirect attack. The collateral attack refers to the challenge on the validity of a prior judgment through a new case rather than by a direct appeal. An examples of a collateral attack include habeas corpus petitions and claims that a prior judgment was invalid after the opposing party cites it for strategic advantage in a new case.

It is also the attempt to avoid the binding effect of a judgment in order to obtain specific relief that the judgment currently impedes.  In conclusion, the collateral attack is the term for an appellate court’s decision to overturn the decision of the lower court and rule in favor of the person filing the appeal.

Read more about appellate

brainly.com/question/11744340

#SPJ1

Reverse is the term for an appellate court’s decision to overturn the decision of the lower court and rule in favor of the person filing the appeal

The Appellate Court's decision on your appeal may take some time. Some courts make their decisions available on their websites. Other courts will mail you a copy of the ruling in the mail.

The Appellate Court can reverse, remand, affirm, or modify the lower court's decision or parts of the judgment.

Reverse: The Appellate Court determines that the lower court's decision was incorrect. When this occurs, the Appellate Court cancels the lower court's decision.

Remand: The Appellate Court instructs the lower court to hold a hearing, or a portion of the case, again.

Affirm: Whenever the Appellate Court agrees that the lower court reached the right conclusion. The decision remains unchanged.

To learn more about The Appellate Court: brainly.com/question/11744340

#SPJ4

Madison supreme court case gave rise to judicial review, which is the authority of the court to strike down any law passed by congress when the court believes the law violates the constitution.

Therefore, Madison supreme court case gave rise to judicial review, which is the authority of the court to strike down any law passed by congress when the court believes the law violates the constitution.

Know more about the Madison supreme court here:

https://brainly.com/question/20628450

#SPJ4

Answer:First you I do not know im in highschool i tryed

Explanation:

The Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.

Therefore, the Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.

Know more about the Fourteenth Amendment here:

https://brainly.com/question/891756

#SPJ4

Answer:

Highway hypnosis is the condition of when you drive/get behind the wheel without thinking or having proper consciousness.

Explanation:

John F Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States.

Therefore, John F Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States.

Know more about President John F Kennedy here:

https://brainly.com/question/21223104

#SPJ4

The answer to the question is shown below.

Instructions to the court:

Therefore, the answer to the question is shown.

Know more about syndromes here:

https://brainly.com/question/24452126

#SPJ4

The impact of cybercrime in the South African Business and ECT act is given below

This article deconstructs the aims of the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 ("the ECTA") and the Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity and Related Matters Bill ("the Bill"), identifying their various strengths and weaknesses.

It has been decided that the prosecution of cybercrime in South Africa will be difficult, as the ECTA and the Bill grapple with the sophisticated phenomena known as cyberspace and an entirely new sort of criminal behavior known as cybercrime.

Article:

The Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002 ("the ECTA") and the Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity and Related Matters Bill ("the Bill") govern cybercrime prosecution in South Africa. In addition to these pieces of legislation, there is common law and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 ("the Constitution").

The ECTA and the Bill must be studied in conjunction with common law (where applicable) and the Constitution in order to have a comprehensive knowledge of cybersecurity and cybercrime prosecution in South Africa. It should be emphasized that if the ECTA does not establish criminal punishment for cybercrime, common law sanctions will be applied. I'm talking about the ECTA.

Because the common law was unsuccessful in dealing with and combating cybercrime, the ECTA was enacted in 2002. The ECTA's goal is to facilitate and regulate electronic communications and transactions.

The ECTA

The ECTA  addresses cybercrime in Chapter XIII, which includes the creation of various new cybercrime-related offenses. These new offenses include acquiring unauthorized access to, interception of, or tampering with data; computer-related extortion, fraud, and forgery; and attempting to commit, as well as aiding and abetting, the aforementioned offenses.

The ECTA also established the position of "cyber inspector," who has the authority to "visit any premises or access any material that has an impact on an inquiry" into a cybercrime. The ECTA was welcomed as an attempt by the South African legislature to address and strengthen cybersecurity, as well as to develop and punish new cybercrimes.

However, the ECTA has been criticized, and it is widely acknowledged that there is still need for development. It is maintained that the consequences of cybercrime, as outlined in Section 89 of the ECTA, are insufficiently severe. This is because, according to the argument, a person guilty of certain ECTA offenses can only face a fine or a year in jail. Other offenses under the ECTA can result in a fine or imprisonment for a maximum of five years.

It is suggested that these sentences are insufficient to discourage cybercrime and that the ECTA should be changed to incorporate tougher penalties. It is also maintained that the police, commercial industry, and academics should all play a role in combating cybercrime. As previously stated, the ECTA established cyber inspectors, but none have been appointed yet, so no actors are presently employing their authority to undertake cybercrime investigations.

The Bill II

The Bill was enacted to rectify the deficiencies of the ECTA, and it is clear that it has done so. First, the Bill levies a fine of at least 5 million Rand and a maximum of 10 million Rand.

The Bill also specifies a minimum sentence of five years and a maximum sentence of ten years in jail. Furthermore, the Bill provides for a combined punishment of a fine and imprisonment.

Second, the Bill addresses the ECTA's lack of engagement of law enforcement, the commercial sector, and academics in the battle against cybercrime by establishing a number of mechanisms to aid in the elimination of cybercrime.

A Cyber Response Committee and a Cybersecurity Centre are two of these entities. These sanctions are far harsher than those under the ECTA, and it is hoped that the Bill would have a more deterrent effect on cybercrime. Examining the ECTA and the Bill, as well as the amount of criticism that each piece of law has received, it is clear that the prosecution of cybercrime in South Africa is not, and will not be, without obstacles.

This is because these pieces of law are dealing with an entirely new sort of criminal behavior as well as the sophisticated phenomena known as the internet. Developing a law that successfully prosecutes cybercrime will thus take time for legislators and cybercrime specialists to develop.

To know more about cybercrime refer to this link:

brainly.com/question/14837324

#SPJ9

Answer:

One concern over money for bail is that it can create a two-tiered system of justice, where those who can afford to pay for bail can get out of jail while awaiting trial, while those who cannot afford to pay for bail remain in jail. This can lead to unequal treatment and outcomes for defendants based on their financial status. Another concern is that bail can be used as a tool to keep defendants in jail even if they are not a flight risk or pose a danger to the community, simply because they cannot afford to pay for bail.

I do have these concerns. I support alternate programs such as pretrial release or supervision, where defendants are released from jail but monitored by pretrial services staff or a court officer. I believe these programs can protect victims by ensuring that defendants are not released if they are a danger to the community or are likely to flee.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

It is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.

Therefore, it is against the law for a child under the age of (D) 18 to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer.

Know more about laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ4

The correct question is given below:

It is against the law for a child under what age to ride in the open bed of a truck or trailer?

a. 12

b. 21

c. 8

d. 18

The judicial method best describes the foreclosure process in Florida.

The judicial department is in price of figuring out the which means of laws, the way to apply them to actual conditions, and whether or not a regulation breaks the rules of the charter. The charter is the best regulation of our nation. The U.S. Ultimate court docket, the best court docket inside the america, is part of the judicial department.

A judicial selection legally binds the parties inside the case, and also can also function a regulation inside the same potential feel as does a statute. In other words, a judicial decision determines the outcome of the unique case, and additionally may regulate destiny behavior of all persons within the jurisdiction of the courtroom.

Learn more about judicial here:https://brainly.com/question/2533637
#SPJ9

If the Court agrees to hear his case, it will issue a writ of certiorari.

Therefore, if the Court agrees to hear his case, it will issue a writ of certiorari.

Know more about certiorari here:

https://brainly.com/question/12106865

#SPJ4

Sarah will most accurately explain the "Right-To-Know" Law to her co-workers in forensic lab by saying, "Scientists must be informed of any potentially dangerous materials in their work."

Congress passed the Federal Right-To-Know Law to ensure that both employers and employees are aware of the chemical risks present at forensics lab or any workplace.

Hazardous materials include anything or any chemical that poses a risk to one's health or physical well-being. Thus, knowing how to operate a handgun in a forensic lab is not under Right-To-Know Law.

In the chain of contact with a chemical, any person or entity is subject to the Federal "Right-to-Know" Law. This law defines a chemical as any substance or mixture of substances. So if there are criminals in the building, telling the forensic scientists the situation isn't covered by this law. The criminal is not a chemical.

Employers of the forensic scientists are required by the federal "Right-to-Know" law to create, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program.

Learn an example of a material that is excluded from Right to Know Law: https://brainly.com/question/14398702

#SPJ4

Heya! It should last until the end of their next session. Have a good day!

If the individual is under the age of 21, a BAC of 0.01% or higher is required.

After being detained or arrested for DUI, the DMV may take disciplinary actions against your driving privilege. A separate action may be taken by the court for the identical offense. The DMV action only affects your driving privilege. The court's action could include a fine, jail time, a DL suspension, and the finalization of a DUI program.

When the court notifies DMV of a DUI conviction, DMV will take additional activity to suspend or withdraw your driving privilege.

To learn more about BAC: brainly.com/question/2231540

#SPJ4

Answer:

The move over law

Explanation:

requires drivers to move-over one lane when possible if an emergency vehicle with flashing lights is parked on the shoulder of the highway. And if traffic is too heavy to move-over safely, the law requires drivers to slow down below the posted speed limit instead AND to be prepared to stop.

A legal citation for a court decision is used by legal professionals to research the law, and includes: "names of the parties, location of a published case, court, & decision date."

It is a standard language that enables one author to refer to legal authorities with enough precision as well as generality that others can follow along.

Some key features regarding the legal citation are-

To know more about the judicial review, here

https://brainly.com/question/14027482

#SPJ4

This statement is true. Most industrialized countries have single court system or also known as unified court system. The courts in these countries have the power to hear both local and national cases.

A unified court system or single court system also attempts to address some issues that are related to the overabundance of courts at the local level.

Legal scholars argued that a centralized administration and judiciary system would effectively streamline the ability to preside over legal matters in the early 20th century. They called for an end to the fragmentation of court systems. Consequently, a unified or single court system emerged.

These court systems were typically created by local residents to supervise and carry out verdicts in local rather than national cases.

Find out what is not a level of court that exists in a unified court system: https://brainly.com/question/2710612

#SPJ4